No Tattoos For Nicole Kidman's Children... Yet
OCT 17, 2007 AT 01:32 AM
As long as you live under my roof young lady! :) Nicole Kidman had a conversation with her two children telling them tattoos are off limits until they are old enough to make an educated decision on their own.
Bella had a phase of blue hair - luckily that only lasted for a little while. But we recently had a discussion at home about tattoos and I had to lay down some ground rules. My husband (Keith Urban) has tattoos, so obviously I don't mind them on principle. But I do think you have to be a certain age before you can choose to do something as permanent as that, and I don't think that age is 14 or 15. Call me old-fashioned, if you will."
Bella is 15 and Connor is 12. I can understand this conversation. I can't imagine what I will be saying to my future teenagers... Oy Vey!
Read more about: Nicole Kidman
no tattoos...but forcing a bizarre religion on them is okay
No tattoos until your over 18 is a good rule!
First, I think they HAVE to be 18 to get a tattoo. I know here in Canada.
you can be under 18 if your parent signs for it to be done.
i agree, a kid does not need a tattoo and they should have to wait until they're 18 so when they do make they're decision to get one it will be something that they'll want and permanent.
Post new comment
When commenting, please be respectful to other INO readers. No racial, sexual or homophobic slurs will be tolerated.