Brad Pitt And Angelina Jolie Are More Influential Than Oprah

Anyone else surprised by this?  Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie came in higher on Time's Most Influential People list than Oprah.  The super hot couple ranked at #21, while Oprah was just behind them at #22.  Oh, and guess who was #59...yep, Miss Vanity Fair scandal herself, Miley Cyrus!  And Robert Downey Jr. ranked at #60.  The full list is here, but you have to individually click through all 100 hundred pictures to see who made it, so...guess who won't be doing that :)
So what do you think, is Brangelina truly more influential than Oprah...I have my doubts...



COMMENTS...

Em Em said:

sorry i dont think someone who commits adultry and starves her unborn children is influential!!! brad pitt you aint sh&t either like you think you are! you are a rotten cheat!!

TGH TGH said:

I can believe they beat out Oprah. Individually they couldn't but combined they can.

x x said:

em---please just stop the same old tabloids storis and you saying like you really know them
they are influencial but more than oprah?i guess time is legit so they have their reasons

GABI GABI said:

Hell NO! Oprah never did drugs and have crazy lesbian sex as a teen and then try to adopt AFRICA to do some damage control after steeling someone ele's husband!
BRANGELINA SUCKS!

Tara Tara said:

Em seems bitter... LOL.

Im just wondering what's up with those pants?! :)

Arlen Arlen said:

I time got it wrong since Oprah has managed to persuade millions of people to reach out to her new church and religion. This is worldwide influence to all corners of the world, not just entertainment.

jellybelly jellybelly said:

Tara seems like a know it all bi5ch!!!
x ~ mind your own fing business ~ its OBVIOUS about the adultry and starvation so shut your raisin face up fat wench!

Page Page said:

Totally unrelated to the topic at hand, WHAT gives with those PANTS????

Jene Jene said:

Yeah wats up with those pants!!

JennD JennD said:

LMAO. Someone's cornflakes got peed in this morning.

Astrid Astrid said:

I want good looking Brad back!

lis lis said:

LMAO @ JennD

Considering the very polarized opinions of these two I'm not surprised... seems like EVERYBODY's got an opinion on them. Which, I suppose, makes them influential.

JRPPY3 JRPPY3 said:

I don't think the list is based on a ranking system of who is 'more' influential. Rather, the list is divided into 5 categories and the 20 people mentioned are the most influential in their respected category.

me646 me646 said:

Influential when it comes to what? Bad acting and being selfish. Cuz I mean I cant think of much more things they are good at. Well and adopting and procreating have to go on that list somewhere.
This is pathetic, Brad has no balls and Angie is just shady so all in all I guess they are the American Dream. Makes sense. Not to me but...

rabbit rabbit said:

adultry is not influential!!
so we should teach our daughters to go after married men???
we should teach our sons to cheat on their wives for hookers?

Mey Mey said:

rabbit - I sincerely hope that you're called that word every day in your life. Since you so easily use it on other women.

Anonymous said:

All 3 of them need to go away.And please brad take off the ugly pants

rabbit rabbit said:

mey~ im flattered that you think you know me so well in saying since i "so easily use it on other woman" ~ where else have i used that word?????????????

you must feel so special to be able to call me out~ you must be so perfect as to never call anyone names!!!!

i can use any name i want~ i call them as i see them!

Ugh Ugh said:

Em I totally agree with you.

luis luis said:

en el resto del mundo si lo son

Stephanie Stephanie said:

Frankly, I kind of hope so.... better to want to adopt and advocate for positive change in the world than to join the cult of O. It's not so much Oprah herself I have a problem with - she obviously does some good things, but the millions of people who seem to think she's the second coming are where my concerns lie.

Sasha Sasha said:

Zzzzzzz. These two have become quite boring with their posing and dinners out. Seriously, who cares? What next? Reports on their subsequent bowel movement? Get back to helping New Orleans, Brad.

kiki35 kiki35 said:

brad and angie....yea, i think not. everything they do is for damage control. they are trying to protect their image. both their careers are in the dump but becuz they adopt,procreate and give to charities non stop they are still considered a listers. why? idk

WAKEUP WAKEUP said:

ATTENTION!

The people on that list is NOT listed in order of influence. It's a list of the 100 most influential people, but it's not a ranked list.

All the leaders and revolutionaries are listed first, then all the heroes and pioneers, then all scientists and thinkers and finally all the builders and titans.

But that doesn't mean some of the titans are not more influential than some of the artists and some of the artists are not more influential than some of the scientist.

Nor does it mean that Brad and Angie are more influential than Oprah. Certainly they're not.

WAKEUP WAKEUP said:

yea, I forgot to mention the artists and entertainers, they're certainly there too and listed before the builders and titans. But like I said, doesn't mean they're MORE influential than all the builders and titans.

Okay, point made.

yoi yoi said:

I actually understand why they are before Oprah it's because Brad+Angelina are worldwide celebrities whereas Oprah is just an American celebrity she is not relevant outside the USA.

Meow Meow said:

Why is there so much hate for Angelina? So what, she did drugs and had wild sex etc, but which rich teen didnt in the 80s-90s? She managed to grow out of this. And who said she stole a married man? Only God know what kind of problems Brad may have had with Aniston,( I heard speculations that Aniston refused to have kids etc to persue her career.) that doesnt make mans new woman a hooker. And as far as I know the whole adopting children wasnt damage control, adopting her first child Maddox was way before the whole Brad thing and she said it turned her life around. Besides if the adoption worked out well and she enjoyed being a mum, why not do this again and help another helpless child? (+ she was actually the one who started the whole adoption feaver)
And about Oprah..Sadly I dont know much about her, but wasnt she involved in some scandal with abusing/insulting school girls or something? (Not that I know much about that, just read some headlines)

Kathleen Kathleen said:

I think Brad and Angelina have more world wide influence. They do so much good while Oprah's is more in the US and when she does good things everyone knows about it. I don't think she has made a trip recently to Iraq or Africa lately to help others??

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This is to prove that you are a human, and not a spam bot.
4 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

When commenting, please be respectful to other INO readers. No racial, sexual or homophobic slurs will be tolerated.