John Travolta Photo Helps Protect Murder Suspect

John Travolta Photo Helps Protect Murder Suspect

Remember Stacy Peterson? So many people thought that her husband Drew Peterson was involved in her disappearance, but the police didn't have enough evidence, so now they are trying to get him on charges of carrying an illegal weapon. Lucky for Drew he has John Travolta on his side...although John doesn't even know it.

"Peterson's lawyers say that Illinois State Police wanted prosecutors to nab the ex-cop on a weapons violation for carrying an AR-15 assault rifle illegally. But this snap that Peterson took with Travolta in 2000, they say, shows Peterson with the assault rifle while on duty, guarding John while on tour shilling 'Battlefield Earth.'

Drew could face up to five years in jail if convicted on a weapons charge. His fourth wife Stacy disappeared last year and his third wife drowned in what cops are calling a homicide. The Illinois State Police couldn't immediately be reached for comment."

TMZ has the photo that could be used for evidence.

And, in non-celeb related news, the police still haven't given up the search for Stacy.  They even began new water related searching techniques just this past week.  I really hope they find her, if anything to bring closure to that poor girl's family.  Such a tragedy...



Click here to return to the home page.


divider

 5 Comments

lolo (not verified)lolo (not verified) said:
with the help of xenu of course
Passerby (not verified)Passerby (not verified) said:
TMZ is always in the middle of ****
<a href="/user/973" title="View user profile.">stefonsky</a>stefonsky said:
that guy just seems way too shady. I hope they find his wife and charge him with her dissapearence and the death of his other wife. i mean, how ironic is that!!! 1 dead, another missing!!!
Passerby (not verified)Passerby (not verified) said:
It sounds irrelevant to me, but whatev. I hope they find the truth.
Passerby (not verified)Passerby (not verified) said:
you fail to mention that a picture taken in 2000 is of no value as evidence since Joel Brodsky (DP's atty) said that the barrel was changed to an illegal length about a year ago. So in 2000, it would not have been an illegal gun = not until he changed to the shorter barrel.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove that you are a human, and not a spam bot.
3 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Join Our Email List
Email:  
For Email Marketing you can trust