Angelina Jolie's Twins Could Fetch $15 Million For First Cover

I'm a little late on this one. Forgive me as I've been in the air flying home. $15 MILLION! FOR PICTURES? There is NO WAY that a magazine would ever make that money back. It has to be more about bragging rights than anything else. Holy Smokes!

There is a possibility that Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are going to get $15 million from the magazine that purchases the distribution rights to the first set of pictures showing off their twin babies.

Has all of this gone too far? Currently People and OK! are the last two standing. And I am sure that both are carrying on with a "whatever it takes" attitude. 



COMMENTS...

Passerby Passerby said:

That's absurd

<a href="/user/1282" title="View user profile.">Booyah</a>
9415 points
Booyah said:

and they are donating that money to??????? Come on, they need the money? They better be matching the donation, and making it known.

<a href="/user/427" title="View user profile.">annielovesfred</a>
300 points
annielovesfred said:

I heard there is something about bill clinton having more affairs in this issue as well. I'm sure that's all hilary needs about now.

<a href="/user/253" title="View user profile.">Savage</a>
815 points
Savage said:

$15 million is a BIIIITTTTT much. That's retarded. I thought the $1mill, or $2mill price tags were over the top, but FIFTEEN? Dang. It DEFINITELY pays to have babies in hollywood.

lolo lolo said:

instead of giving that $$$ 2 brangie why cant the magazine companies just donate that 2 charity....the world we live in 2day..sigh.

<a href="/user/87" title="View user profile.">Amy</a>
6735 points
Amy said:

That doesn't even look like Angie.

<a href="/user/15" title="View user profile.">shark</a>
300 points
shark said:

Since the money will go to charity, I say the more the better!

Passerby Passerby said:

It going to charity and we able to see the gorgeous couple babies. It is like rasing money for charity. J.lo twins were 5 million and she decided to keep the money no one blame hebr for it. But Brangie is a kind of raise money to charity we should support . By the way I am not a fan but i like the idea of it.

Passerby Passerby said:

JLo is a selfish fat a$$ pig for keeping that money!

Passerby Passerby said:

I don't think the kids are worth 15 million $come on it is just babies they all look the same.What a sick world.

Passerby Passerby said:

yea donate it to charity - then collect it as a tax right-off and receive the money back.

Passerby2 Passerby2 said:

Depending on how much of their income they donate each year, they may not be able to deduct everything. Also, a deduction only reduces the amount of taxable income. It is not as if they get the full value of their donation back in tax breaks. Also, donations to foreign charities usually can't be deducted....

<a href="/user/271" title="View user profile.">Elina</a>
300 points
Elina said:

I suppose it is a law of supply and demand at work here. as much as we claim we are not interested there must a a gajillion of other people who are. It is that plain and simple. Paying any amount of money for anybodys child is already over they top. It is good that it will be donated. I like Angelina and not really trying to accuse her of anything but I know when wealthy individuals create charities in their names money is used for tax write offs, there are also many many ways to create smart and savvy financial operations with this money. However, this money will belong to her anyways and I am optimistic that she will do good with it.

aimees aimees said:

i find this sickening!!! there are starving people in the world dying everyday and celebs are getting MILLIONS for a picture of their newborns?? yeah, i've heard that Ang and Brad are going to give it to charity, but john q. public will never know if they did or not...blah

Daniee Daniee said:

I would never SELL MY CHILDREN period. They'd hate me for it when they got older and knew that I sold them to some trashy supermarket tabloid. There are many other ways to raise millions for charity. Ask Bill Clinton.

<a href="/user/936" title="View user profile.">Heli</a>
5520 points
Heli said:

To have baby picture on a magazine… how is that selling your children? lol

<a href="/user/213" title="View user profile.">Monica</a>
52325 points
Monica said:

I'm glad this has nothing to do with me so I don't have to worry about it.

Passerby Passerby said:

Why would anyone pay 4 or 5 dollars for a magazine to see pics of babies, when they will be all over the internet the next day for free???? I don't believe that they give the money to charity...Last time she donated the money to an organization that she owned...Then a year later she shut down the organization...

Passerby Passerby said:

What the hell is this world coming to?

chandra2 chandra2 said:

15 mil huh? i guess this recession isnt affecting hollywood. Can I get 75 to fill my gas tank angie? I should start my own charity called help feed my american family.

kiki kiki said:

this makes me so sick to my stomach. especially when i think of all the straving babies all over the world that can benefit from this money. 15 million? all those babies look EXACTLY the same. you cant really make out their features until they are about a years old. so stupid.

Gemma Gemma said:

I completely agree with you. IF Brangelina ACTUALLY give ALL of that cash to charity then all this ridiculousness would make sense.

Passerby Passerby said:

this is ridiculous!!
the priorities in this world are insane! especailly angelina HOlie being a "humantarian" PAlease!

Passerby Passerby said:

btw.....she is the ugliest woman ever! look how big her forehead is!

<a href="/user/936" title="View user profile.">Heli</a>
5520 points
Heli said:

Ok now this is the funniest statement I’ve heard so far :-)

Passerby Passerby said:

she looks like an alien tranny

Passerby Passerby said:

What the hell is wrong with these people? Do they see what in happening in Darfur and Sudan? Do you know how many people they could feed and cloth and give proper health care for that kind of money? I am so pissed at these people and she should be ashamed of herself for allowing it.

Passerby Passerby said:

She is such a hypocrite: this is from her VAinity Fair article:

She said that she has never seen Voight's 1979 Oscar-winning performance in Coming Home.

“Because that was when my father left my mom, and the woman who he cheated on her with is in the film,” Jolie says. (When rumors that Jolie had an affair with Pitt while he was wed to Jennifer Aniston, she denied them. "Do I need to defend that I’m a decent woman?" she said.)

~um but she did the SAME thing! stupid a$$ ho

Scoopaddict Scoopaddict said:

It's crazy how much they are willing to pay, but since they give it to charity like they did w/ Shiloh's pics, I'm with some of the other posts, the more the merrier! And w/ how obsessed the public and the paparazzi are with them, I can't imagine how invasive and unsafe it could be for everyone if they didn't sell the pics. The paparazzi would be going above and beyond to get the first pics....and would probably take dangerous ways to do so.

Polly Polly said:

That's obscene.

Beyond Border Beyond Border said:

I'll buy the magz that will publish the baby picture of the Brad & Angelina's twins. For those commenting that Angelina is the Ugliest blah.., blah, blah b*tch please if she's ugly i''m afraid to see what YOU look like - a road kill or a one eyed medusa bwahahahah

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This is to prove that you are a human, and not a spam bot.
6 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

When commenting, please be respectful to other INO readers. No racial, sexual or homophobic slurs will be tolerated.