Scarlett Johansson Wants To Look Sane Not Sexy
Jul 8, 2008 AT 08:35 am
"I don't normally think about being sexy. I think: 'Do I look presentable? Do I look sane?'"
-- Scar Jo talking about being sexy in next month's Cosmopolitan
She's a total snot, but a lovely girl. So why did they whittle her already-tiny waist down to the size of her neck? I wonder if she had final approval of the actual cover? Hmmm.
her tiny waist? um ok! she is a fat slob!
And I'll bet you're just stunning, aren't you?
SHE LOOKS AMAZING!
They clearly airbrushed the shiz out of the waist. It doesn't look natural at all. Like a Barbie doll, if she really had those proportions, she'd fall flat on her face. How ridiculous. She's super thin, and still, they had to mess with it and make her even smaller!
I don't recall her waist being that tiny.
Her weist is NOT that tiny indeed, the picture has been HEAVILY modified. The only thing she has is her breasts. A woman having big breasts DOES NOT mean they have curves.
I think when the magazines airbrush the heck out of someone, it makes you even more aware of what the magazines consider the stars flaws. So the next time you see ScarJo you are going to be looking at her waist and thinking did she gain weight, she is looking a little thick in the middle as compared to the way she looks on my copy of Cosmo. Otherwise if they had left her alone your eyes wouldn't be drawn to her waist the next time you see a pic of her. Slight airbrushing is one thing, dramatic airbrushing is another. This looks nothing like her, they over did it. She is not that tiny.
Cosmo magazine is hilarious. Just look at those cover "stories"!!!
Agree. Her waist is NOT that tiny.
Well that cover is really going to promote her not being sexy * insert eye roll here *
Total PHOTOSHOP job!!
There's something wrong with a person who would actually release the album that she did. Did she actually think it was good? I'd be hiding under a bed if I sang like that...why let the world know? Besides that, she tried to make it seem like she and Obama were email buddies...he had to come out and correct the record. Seems like she is desperate for attention.
I agree. She's beautiful, but each time she opens her mouth -- whether she's singing or speaking -- I dislike her more and more.
Actually she recorded that album to only have something for herself and her friends to enjoy. Those songs are re-recorded tom waits tracks and i think her deep voice is mellow and fantastic. she is a knock out and a girl who knows what she wants out of hollywood. shes fantastic, beautiful, and doesn't care about getting super unhealthily skinny for the cameras. i love that girl!
Not pretty, Not entertaining, Not witty, Not funny, Not a good actress, Not in good shape, Not a good singer, Not a nice person and Not a good dresser. So please inform me again as to why she is relevant? The only reason she has boobs is cuz she is on the thick side. If she started to work out and take better care of herself she would loose alot of the boobs and most of that arm fat. And its almost impossible to have a 24" waist (like this photoshopped cover) unless you hit the gym hard or you starve yourself. Cosmo is such a freakin joke I cant believe girls read this ****.
Okay. "ON THE THICK SIDE"? You honestly think Scarlett is ON THE THICK SIDE? I mean, I'm not her biggest fan, either, but at least I can admit that she's not a stick, and that's a GOOD thing. You think she has ARM FAT? GOOD. GOD. I hope you never have daughters, because they'll probably grow up with horrendous body-image issues!
AMEN sister, AMEN!
i'm so tired of this unrealistic covers and photos it's getting more and more ridicolus .
It doesn't look photoshopped to me. She has a classic hourglass figure.
Almost every pic in magazines are photoshopped. (read it) And she has a great body, but sorry, her face is just okay. nothing special. And I still think of her in Home Alone 2 Doen't look much differnt in the face.
Melissa22, I have been wondering the same thing. She is a marginal actress with a horrible singing voice. Her boobs are the only reason she gets work. As for the singing she probably thinks she's done a good job. Nylon magazine put her on the cover of their annual music issue, completely validating her delusions as a singer. With all the great bands and singers out their they choose this albatross sounding wench for the cover.
All these comments are hilarious!! ScarJo is so far from relevant, I bought the Cosmo mag just to read the article and laugh! (hey, a girl needs some entertainment while sweating it out on the elliptical for 45 minutes!) She once admitted she doesn't exercise. Well, it shows, honey! I hope she starts for the sake of her health, and to tone up a little for her wedding. She's not obese, but she's no stick either. I'm sorry, but actresses have no excuse not to look perfect...it's their JOB. All they have to do is act and show up to premieres...I'm sorry but we all pay to see their movies to see beautiful, perfect, people. And as to her album, OMG! I literally frowned after listening to 10 seconds of her awful monotone. She needs to crawl back under a rock and quit trying to make us all care about her.
You're right. My main criteria for watching a movie is the attractiveness of the cast, because those who might happen to not fit my standard of beauty are obviousy TERRIBLE thespians, and will therefore bore me. *rolls eyes.* The comments in this post are almost making me LIKE Scarlett, and I didn't think that was possible!
"I don't normally think about being sexy. I think: 'Do I look presentable? Do I look sane?'" She is full of shi*t no reason to explain it's obvious.
Well said, Ernestine! Imagine, watching a movie to see thespians at work.
Oh, I know. Isn't that an odd concept? I'll bet half the people who've commented on this thread don't watch foreign movies cuz they don't wanna see no pesky WORD-THINGIES appear at the bottom of that thar SCREEN thingie.
Ernestine and the like: Don't be simple. I didn't mean we only watch movies to see perfect people...of course we want to see talented thespians who move us with their performances (case in point: the unattractive yet amazingly talented Philip Seymour Hoffman who wowed audiences with his Academy Award Winning portrayal of Truman Capote)...But in cases with movies that have untalented actresses such as Scarlett--at least give us something to look at! She absolutely bored me to tears in the supposedly brilliant "Lost in Translation." Snore. Oh, and by "word thingies," I think you mean "subtitles." Look it up if you don't know it, dear.
You're too stupid to understand sarcasm. It's okay!
And YOU are too stupid to understand that my purposely ignoring your sarcasm was my way of calling you stupid without actually using the word. And anyway, why are we attacking each other? This post is about Scarlett. Unless you have something to say about HER, I'm done.
Post new comment