People Magazine To Debut Angelina Jolie And Brad Pitt Twins Tonight At 7

People Magazine To Debut Angelina Jolie And Brad Pitt Twins Tonight At 7

Don't forget to visit People at 7pm (if their site can handle it) when they debut a few pictures from the 30 PAGES WORTH OF SHOTS that will be available in this upcoming magazine edition. Yes, you read that correctly... 30 pages. Thirty. 3-0.

Update: Here is the cover! I thought they would show more pictures! I'm so surprised... Anyway, People Magazine says there are only 19 pages.  I still can't wait to see it all.



COMMENTS...

karolina karolina said:

omg 30 ? it's crazy... too crazy ...

Passerby Passerby said:

I really can't wait to see the pics.

Passerby Passerby said:

Not in this, or any other lifetime. I find it scary and a little pathetic that people "can't wait to see them". My God, don't people have real lives?

Passerby Passerby said:

People have their own life but we love to see the pics because this family is very adorable.

Passerby2 Passerby2 said:

If you find it pathetic, then why are you commenting on this page????

Linda Linda said:

Since they paid so much People Mag is trying to do whatever possible to sell copies. If it was just a 5 or 6 page spread people would just scan it at the supermarket.

Passerby Passerby said:

and then they complain about the attention photogs place on their kids...even if it is for "charity" not sure 100% will really go to charity probably go to their "staff." Sorry,off tangent there...it just seems like these baby pics contribute to the vicious cycle and deliver the message its ok to snap my kids too! They're just feeding the beast!!! Sure there's the argument that paps will take pics anyway- but why invite it and make it ok, and draw more attention to the young ones. Its just disgusting, have some integrity and respect for your kids.

Passerby Passerby said:

It is not making ok. It is a way of doing in a better way.Don't tell me celbs who didn't give the baby pics didn't take the baby out in a way to make a debut AKA let the paps take the baby pics. Dont be hypocrate. Brad and Angie are not the first or the last to give the baby pics out.
when I went to see those celbs thread I didn't see any negative comment even those who kept the money. What we see here is nothing but jealousy and hypocracy. I am very happy With what Brad and Angie did knowing the attention in their family, the control the pics and use it to help others.

Passerby Passerby said:

not being a hypocrite, I think the same of other celebs who sell pics to mags. And i may be wrong but this whole craze with baby pics was their doing back when they sold pics of Shiloh. All I'm saying is they are contributing to the frenzy- its just like a drug, you loonies will want more and more!

Passerby Passerby said:

You call their fans loonies because they don't buy to this jealousy and hate. loonies are the one who love to hate on them.
B and A are a world wide exitiment. Selling photos doesn't make anybody fans to want more and more.

Passerby Passerby said:

every thing go to charity. Whats the problem

<a href="/user/3055" title="View user profile.">MochaWisdom</a>
1525 points
MochaWisdom said:

Everything goes to charity so I think this is awesome...

Passerby Passerby said:

She is still a home wrecking whore...

Passerby Passerby said:

::YAWN::

Passerby Passerby said:

I don't recall Brad or Angelina ever complaining about the paps taking their or their children's picture. What I always hear them complain about is trespassing, taking photos of their property, and jumping and yelling at the kids, which scares them. I don't think there's anything wrong with wanting basic privacy and for the paps to follow the law. Selling photos doesn't invite the paparazzi. They really don't need the invitation. The paparazzi has been following them for 3 years. It's not going to stop or slow down if the photos weren't for sale.

Passerby Passerby said:

I don't want to see 30 pages of anyones kids except my own..Im not going to the site, and Im not buying that rag to see pics of her 2 new blobs..I doubt all of that money will go to charity, they didn't donate all the money they received from Shiloh, and what they did donate, they donated to themselves and the Jolie/Pitt Foundation...I see there are some Brangaloonies on her with the comment that people are jealous of Brad and Skankalina..well I for one wouldn't want to be in her shoes, she has serious mental issues....she is looking a lot older than her 33 years..and brad is just a doormat, and baby daddy....the 2 blobs brought in the same paycheck AJ did for the whole year of 2007..hilarious

kiki kiki said:

this is completely stupid. i don't know about most ppl but i don't even buy magazines. i look at them while i am in line and put them back when i am about to check out. and, since sites like this one have popped up, i rarely do that. why spend money on something i could see for free. the paps are going to follow them rather they sale pic or not. that's why i wouldn't never bothering selling the pic. if they want to keep their kids private they should do what they've been doing for the past couple of weeks because know one has seen any pic of the babies. selling pic do invite them in because they get a taste and they will want more and more. and, fyi, b and a are the main ones always complaining about privacy. and from the artilce i read the only charity that money is going to is the one they created that helps kids around the world or something like that. the brangelina phenomenal will wear off soon enuff. but, who am i kidding, they will just find something else to do to keep ppl interested. i still like angie but i liked her a hell of a lot more before she got with the balding pitt.

Passerby Passerby said:

wh*ring their kids......again. Must be desperate for attention to sell their babies like this. Obviously, they must come out to the sun sometime in their lives, and i can wait for that time to "view" the littlest jolie-pitt ho's

Passerby Passerby said:

I have seen other stars who sold the baby pics I too never seen any negativity even with those who kept the money. It is sad how it is for this two.There are stars who goes out with their kids almost everyday and they never get any of this whor*ing title. Just because you all are intersted in their life they should remain behind close doors.
I personally would love to see the pics.

Passerby Passerby said:

should=shouldn't

Passerby Passerby said:

On there now and the pics have not debuted...anyone else not seeing them?

Passerby Passerby said:

i cant find the pics

Passerby Passerby said:

yeah! they even took of the banner at the top of the page saying that they are debuting at 7...i dont see anything!

<a href="/user/87" title="View user profile.">Amy</a>
22235 points
Amy said:

Where are the pics, People has taken down the announcement banner, but that is it so far.

<a href="/user/83" title="View user profile.">Kat</a>
300 points
Kat said:

Still no pics - took down the banner, new story about Reese and Jake, but no pictures. WTF!!!

<a href="/user/87" title="View user profile.">Amy</a>
22235 points
Amy said:

Yeah, I guess Reese and Jake are NOT engaged, but no twins.

Passerby Passerby said:

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20216352,00.html

found it

Passerby Passerby said:

where are the pics????

<a href="/user/83" title="View user profile.">Kat</a>
300 points
Kat said:

The banner did say 7PM EDT, right?

Passerby Passerby said:

Awww...that sucks. You can barely see the babies in the picture they put up

Passerby Passerby said:

the pictures are up on dlisted.com ACT FAST before they make them put it down

Passerby Passerby said:

http://dlisted.com/node/27527#comments

<a href="/user/87" title="View user profile.">Amy</a>
22235 points
Amy said:

Finally saw them, still can't find it going into people on my own without a link.

<a href="/user/83" title="View user profile.">Kat</a>
300 points
Kat said:

Bonus pic here:

http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/26439974.html

Passerby Passerby said:

don't see it.

<a href="/user/87" title="View user profile.">Amy</a>
22235 points
Amy said:

Looks like there will only be 19 pages and not 30.

Passerby Passerby said:

Same old homewrecking whore is right. Sad that these kids have to be stuck with two narcissisistic jerk offs as parents. Well at least they deserve each other. now now one else has to be saddled with either of them - until the whore decides to go after another married man, which I'm sure will be soon.

<a href="/user/25" title="View user profile.">Heidi</a>
300 points
Heidi said:

well, I'd like to see a poll about who plans to buy the magazine when it goes on sell Monday. lol

Passerby Passerby said:

haters haters haters haters!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Passerby Passerby said:

they look soooooooooooooooooooo in love!!! cute pic!!

Passerby Passerby said:

Eh, they look like regular ol' newborn babies to me.

????????? ????????? said:

otlichnye fotki

Sweetie Sweetie said:

I saw the link to this story and tried not to click.....but couldn't help myself!

I hate all the fuss really. And think 30 pages is just overkill and such a statement on the sad state of celebrity god 'status' in society.....hmmm...however, still read every word or this story and that urkes me even more : ) - lol

Passerby Passerby said:

I don't hate anyone. But the whole thing is ridiculous. These are babies for crying out loud. There are people out there who can't pay their mortgages, have to ride their bikes to work, etc. When we find out a magazine is paying this price for pictures of babies, it tends to make people angry! Plus, the pedestal that celebrities are put upon is getting scary.

I realize the money is going to charity, but there are celebrities who won't even have their babies' pictures taken for that!

media boy media boy said:

So Brangelina finally cashed in on their gossip empire... and their going to give it away too? smart move

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <i> <b> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove that you are a human, and not a spam bot.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

When commenting, please be respectful to other INO readers. No racial, sexual or homophobic slurs will be tolerated.