Pink Prefers Adoption

Pink wants to adopt a child when she's ready for babies, rather than give birth. No, not because she's scared of the pain or because she wants to be like Angelina Jolie. She just thinks there are already too many kids in this world without a home. The singer said,
"I don't know if I need to have my own
(children). I rescue dogs, so I would probably rescue kids. I feel like
with global warming and all, why produce more? Foster parent. Adoption."
What do you think...does she have a point?













I have been saying the SAME THING since I was in the 2nd grade literally. Good for her, I wish more people were selfless and saw the bigger picture. I too rescue dogs thats where it all starts lol. And please stop referencing Angelina Jolie EVERYTIME you post about adoption its so annoying and just kind of ingorant sounding. Big deal she adopted 3 kids, she also had 3 so her true motivations are too be questioned.
3040 points
HAHA Dogs and kids are NOT the same thing!! So delusional.
Riviera, brilliant observation - dogs and kids are not the same thing. You must be kidding - I would have never figured that one out. I don't think that was what Pink meant at all. She simply meant she did not object to taking in those (man or beast) in need of a home and love. Good for her!!!! Personally, I'd rather take in a dog...................a whole lot less trouble and unconditional love.
She drowned one of her dogs in her swimming pool . her boyfriend was Tommy Lee who drowned someone else kid in his swimming pool
I agree with Riviera 100%. If you're comparing adopting a child to adopting a dog, you may not be ready for parenthood yet.
3040 points
Thank you, AdoptiveMom! :O)
Wow. You really have no clue what she's saying do you? If you really are an adoptive mom try looking at it again to see the meaning behind her words.
Oh, and get off your high horse and come down and join the rest of us.
Yes!!! I agree!!
DEFINITELY right!!!!! I am the parent of an adopted child. That child is loved every bit as much as a biological one. What would have been the point of becoming a Mother any other way? There are children in this world starving.....such a shame. This wouldn't be happening if people exercised birth control. And now, illegals are coming into our country, having kids like rabbits (that we are supporting via school, etc.). Enough is enough. The human race is NOT going to die anytime soon!!!!
300 points
i think this is a really good idea. i don't want to have kids but if i did i would most defintally adopt! brandyy =]
330 points
Being a parent is rather pesonal. Why do they want to discuss something so personal in public? It's like Jessica Simpson stating that Tony Romo is her Future Baby's Daddy (gag). Who cares? And in today's society, that changes as fast as the weather. This gal is flakey.
i think its a great idea! im thinking about doing the same thing. i definately
want my own child but anything after that i think adoption is the way to go! they are sooooo many kids out there that really need love and i have lots to give!
20465 points
To the first post: I don't think having my own kids is being selfish
As long as Pink is talking about her own feelings and views I'm fine. It's what's right for her.
There are too many kids out there that need homes and that is a very sad thing. I'm not in a place to adopt or to have more kids at the moment.
However, I do feel that loving someone so much and wanting to have their child and then carrying and preparing for that child is a wonderful, bonding, magical, natural thing that is not selfish.
You can't tell people not to procreate because too many people are irresponsible with it.
Totally agree...having your own kids is not selfish! That never even would have occurred to me...because I have two biological children; I am selfish! What a lame statement!!!!
I've had breeders tell me I'm selfish because I don't want kids, which is infuriating. I should get a damn MEDAL for being responsible. Too many people are having kids when their hearts are elsewhere or they can't effectively give their offspring the BEST possible life, without being a burden on other people and their wallets and/or time.
300 points
I have a child I gave birth to and I love her to pieces. But I have a desire in my heart to adopt a child. I too feel like there are so many children out there who need homes a families to love them. I love that she said this.
Wait hang on, becoming a parent is not about rescuing someone whatever you become a parent through adoption or not.
THANK YOU!!!
anon 11:27...i agree...dogs love you no matter what, you cant embarass them, and they never get mad at you or tell you that they hate you. animals really are the best. and as for riviera.....dogs and kids arent the same thing...your right. because kids dont get gassed when there are too many of them..animals do. you wanna save a life. adopt an ANIMAL.
18455 points
I dont want kids period. So obviously I do think they have something with the whole "too many people for the planet" idea BUT who am I to tell someone they cant procreate. There are so many ways to argue each side of this discussion and I would encourage everyone to try and see the other side.
I think being a parent means different things to different people. I don't see anything wrong with her use of the word 'rescue' when referring to adoption. If 'rescuing a child' through adoption means providing that child with a stable environment with all needs met and unconditional love, then that's great! As packed as our planet is right now, imagine, forty or fifty years from now. There'll be even more people then. I think it's wonderful that some people are more interested in adopting than having their own children. That being said, I also don't think it's selfish to have biological children. What I think is selfish is people who are having five, six, or more children these days. You gotta think about how your need to mass reproduce is going to impact others and the environment. A few decades ago it was OK having large biological families. My mom has five siblings. But the people who are starting to have kids RIGHT NOW should be responsible about the number of people they are putting into the world. You might think you have the right to have a million biological children if you want, but grow up already and think about something bigger than your own wants. I'd hope to have a biological child, and adopt.
I think being a parent means different things to different people. I don't see anything wrong with her use of the word 'rescue' when referring to adoption. If 'rescuing a child' through adoption means providing that child with a stable environment with all needs met and unconditional love, then that's great! As packed as our planet is right now, imagine, forty or fifty years from now. There'll be even more people then. I think it's wonderful that some people are more interested in adopting than having their own children. That being said, I also don't think it's selfish to have biological children. What I think is selfish is people who are having five, six, or more children these days. You gotta think about how your need to mass reproduce is going to impact others and the environment. A few decades ago it was OK having large biological families. My mom has five siblings. But the people who are starting to have kids RIGHT NOW should be responsible about the number of people they are putting into the world. You might think you have the right to have a million biological children if you want, but grow up already and think about something bigger than your own wants. I'd hope to have a biological child, and adopt.
I think being a parent means different things to different people. I don't see anything wrong with her use of the word 'rescue' when referring to adoption. If 'rescuing a child' through adoption means providing that child with a stable environment with all needs met and unconditional love, then that's great! As packed as our planet is right now, imagine, forty or fifty years from now. There'll be even more people then. I think it's wonderful that some people are more interested in adopting than having their own children. That being said, I also don't think it's selfish to have biological children. What I think is selfish is people who are having five, six, or more children these days. You gotta think about how your need to mass reproduce is going to impact others and the environment. A few decades ago it was OK having large biological families. My mom has five siblings. But the people who are starting to have kids RIGHT NOW should be responsible about the number of people they are putting into the world. You might think you have the right to have a million biological children if you want, but grow up already and think about something bigger than your own wants. I'd hope to have a biological child, and adopt.
I think being a parent means different things to different people. I don't see anything wrong with her use of the word 'rescue' when referring to adoption. If 'rescuing a child' through adoption means providing that child with a stable environment with all needs met and unconditional love, then that's great! As packed as our planet is right now, imagine, forty or fifty years from now. There'll be even more people then. I think it's wonderful that some people are more interested in adopting than having their own children. That being said, I also don't think it's selfish to have biological children. What I think is selfish is people who are having five, six, or more children these days. You gotta think about how your need to mass reproduce is going to impact others and the environment. A few decades ago it was OK having large biological families. My mom has five siblings. But the people who are starting to have kids RIGHT NOW should be responsible about the number of people they are putting into the world. You might think you have the right to have a million biological children if you want, but grow up already and think about something bigger than your own wants. I'd hope to have a biological child, and adopt.
I agreed with you , the first time
OK I don't know how that ended up on there four times. I guess I mass reproduced my comment. lol.
3040 points
LOL!!! Good one!!
Pink/I didnt mean dogs and kids are the same thing I meant the whole being open to adopting something usually starts with a pet or even a foster child. What a bunch of righteous bitches you guys just proved your selfs to be. Way to show you total ignorance and not really HEAR what someone is saying.
300 points
Adoption isn't that easy if you want a newborn. International adoption isn't that easy either. I'm sure it helps if you're loaded with cash but I've watched many women struggle with infertility and try that route just to end up with empty arms. It's very frustrating, these children need good homes, I wish they'd make it easier for loving couples/people to give those children the love they need.
3040 points
To those who think that the world is over-populated - maybe it is in China or India, but it certainly isn't in the Western world. Europe's population is dying out. Birthrates are the lowest in Italy, Spain and Germany. There is a much larger old popultion to birth ratio. The only reason the US and Canada are doing decently population-wise is because of immigration. However, even in countries where there is a large brith rate (China), they are in trouble as well because they are choosing to have male babies instead of female babies. It will cause a concern several years from now. I don't know why everyone thinks there are too many babies out there. Do your homework, society is dying out and it's a fact.
China, India, the Western world...all part of the same world. Society is not dying out. It is hurting the world over due to an unequal distribution of resources and unequal distribution of people. It's a global issue.
300 points
This topic always gets everyone fired up! Pink can do what she wants and so can all of you. She's lucky she has choices.
12080 points
Sure, she has a point. It's wonderful to adopt, and it is wonderful to give birth to your own children. To each their own. And I don't think she is saying that she is READY to have children.... just that those are the thoughts she's had about parenting thus far. At least she is waiting 'til she's ready, either way!
300 points
DITTO Riviera great post just what I was about to say.
Pink needs education.
NOTHING wrong with adoption however... just a VERY bad argument.
Antonia
I think pink not procreating is a great idea.
Riviera and Antonia you are both right. Thanks for your comments I couldn´t say it better
305 points
That's precisely what I plan on doing *if* I ever want a child. My background may help explain it, though - I've had endometriosis for 16 years, as well as cysts and all kinds of girlie bits problems and have been told that, by now, there's most likely too much scar tissue to conceive. I don't think people who have biological children are selfish, though, I've felt that whole biological clock thing myself, but I've grown up under the assumption that I wouldn't be able to have biological children. That's ok with me. Yes, I do think the human population is putting a strain on the planet and even if I could bear a child, I'd rather adopt if I'm ever ready for parenthood. Part of my reasoning is that I rescue animals, so how I could I possibly not extend the same compassion to a human child? I think that's all Pink meant. It's too bad that some people have to be negative about *everything*.
1375 points
Its her decision. We make our own decisions. No biggie!
adopting children to control the population is the stupidest reason I've ever heard.
I'd say ANY reason to adopt a child is a smart reason to the child being adopted. I don't think an adopted child would call it a stupid reason, I think they'd be too appreciative to pass judement. There are MANY reasons to adopt, and a person can have many reasons all at the same time factoring into their decision, none of which should be up for judgement. A person isn't likely to adopt SIMPLY because they want to control the population, but if it's a factor along with lots of other reasons, where's the stupidity in that? Geesh.
As someone who is adopted and who has adopted, I find it offensive when people say having "my own" child versus adoption. When you adopt a child they ARE yours just as much as any biological child would be.
That said, it is obviously a choice that is completely personal and as something so personal it is bound to have different meaning for everyone. We DO need to remember that we only have one earth, and we need to take care of it and the people who inhabit it; especially children. For some people that means adoption.
All that matters is that you teach the children in your life, adopted or biological, to take of our planet and other people.
The topic of adoption does evoke a lot of varying feelings, understandably.
I definitely think that adoption needs to be made easier. By that I mean there are so many children all over the world who are in desperate need of a loving family, and there are equally lots of families who want to give homes to these children.
I appreciate that the authorities cannot simply give children to the first person who says they want them.
I know background checks must be done etc, but the whole process takes too long, depriving both the child and the parents of the one things money cannot buy - time.
The sooner children are places with loving families the better.
I don't understand why the adoption process can, in some case, take several years to complete?
Surely there is some way of speeding everything up, so that children can begin to live better lives with their new parents?
One last thing, it really bugs me when children are referred to as 'the adopted son and/or daughter of'.
Why is the fact that they are adopted relevant?
You never read 'the biological son and/or daughter of'.
I agree...folks always say "just" adopt, like you simply fill out a form, mail it in and in 6 weeks you're a parent. It is VERY difficult to adopt a child. If you are looking to adopt an infant in this country, your wait could be YEARS before a birthmom CHOOSES YOU. It's not a matter of adoptive parents choosing a baby at all.
International adoption can be very risky as well as extremely expensive. Countries will close their adoption programs with no warning and they don't give a frig where you are in the process. Received your placement and the country closes? Too bad. That child you've fallen in love with through pics and records will not become your child due to some political crap you have no control over.
Celebs often don't run into these same issues, but the average couple will not be able to "just adopt" with the same ease.
adopt me Pink :D
OH YEAH!!! I reaaaaaally like the way she think, I am agree with this.
1347 points
Pink + parenting advice = disaster.
1347 points
By the way, I plan on not eating anymore until the world's fruit, vegetable, and grain supplies are reduced. There's just too much damn rice in this world.
Good for Pink!!!! That is so true - you can love any child! There are so many children out there who need homes, and parents and LOVE!!
Post new comment
When commenting, please be respectful to other INO readers. No racial, sexual or homophobic slurs will be tolerated.