
Pink wants to adopt a child when she's ready for babies, rather than give birth. No, not because she's scared of the pain or because she wants to be like Angelina Jolie. She just thinks there are already too many kids in this world without a home. The singer said,
"I don't know if I need to have my own (children). I rescue dogs, so I would probably rescue kids. I feel like with global warming and all, why produce more? Foster parent. Adoption."
What do you think...does she have a point?
I have been saying the SAME THING since I was in the 2nd grade literally. Good for her, I wish more people were selfless and saw the bigger picture. I too rescue dogs thats where it all starts lol. And please stop referencing Angelina Jolie EVERYTIME you post about adoption its so annoying and just kind of ingorant sounding. Big deal she adopted 3 kids, she also had 3 so her true motivations are too be questioned.
HAHA Dogs and kids are NOT the same thing!! So delusional.
Occasional VisitorSep 5, 2008 @ 11:19 am
Riviera, brilliant observation - dogs and kids are not the same thing. You must be kidding - I would have never figured that one out. I don't think that was what Pink meant at all. She simply meant she did not object to taking in those (man or beast) in need of a home and love. Good for her!!!! Personally, I'd rather take in a dog...................a whole lot less trouble and unconditional love.
She drowned one of her dogs in her swimming pool . her boyfriend was Tommy Lee who drowned someone else kid in his swimming pool
I agree with Riviera 100%. If you're comparing adopting a child to adopting a dog, you may not be ready for parenthood yet.
Thank you, AdoptiveMom! :O)
Occasional VisitorSep 5, 2008 @ 02:58 pm
Wow. You really have no clue what she's saying do you? If you really are an adoptive mom try looking at it again to see the meaning behind her words. Oh, and get off your high horse and come down and join the rest of us.
Yes!!! I agree!!
DEFINITELY right!!!!! I am the parent of an adopted child. That child is loved every bit as much as a biological one. What would have been the point of becoming a Mother any other way? There are children in this world starving.....such a shame. This wouldn't be happening if people exercised birth control. And now, illegals are coming into our country, having kids like rabbits (that we are supporting via school, etc.). Enough is enough. The human race is NOT going to die anytime soon!!!!
i think this is a really good idea. i don't want to have kids but if i did i would most defintally adopt! brandyy =]
BrowserSep 5, 2008 @ 11:23 am
Being a parent is rather pesonal. Why do they want to discuss something so personal in public? It's like Jessica Simpson stating that Tony Romo is her Future Baby's Daddy (gag). Who cares? And in today's society, that changes as fast as the weather. This gal is flakey.
BrowserSep 5, 2008 @ 11:32 am
i think its a great idea! im thinking about doing the same thing. i definately want my own child but anything after that i think adoption is the way to go! they are sooooo many kids out there that really need love and i have lots to give!
To the first post: I don't think having my own kids is being selfish As long as Pink is talking about her own feelings and views I'm fine. It's what's right for her. There are too many kids out there that need homes and that is a very sad thing. I'm not in a place to adopt or to have more kids at the moment. However, I do feel that loving someone so much and wanting to have their child and then carrying and preparing for that child is a wonderful, bonding, magical, natural thing that is not selfish. You can't tell people not to procreate because too many people are irresponsible with it.
Totally NOT ObsessedSep 5, 2008 @ 11:36 am
Totally agree...having your own kids is not selfish! That never even would have occurred to me...because I have two biological children; I am selfish! What a lame statement!!!!
I've had breeders tell me I'm selfish because I don't want kids, which is infuriating. I should get a damn MEDAL for being responsible. Too many people are having kids when their hearts are elsewhere or they can't effectively give their offspring the BEST possible life, without being a burden on other people and their wallets and/or time.
I have a child I gave birth to and I love her to pieces. But I have a desire in my heart to adopt a child. I too feel like there are so many children out there who need homes a families to love them. I love that she said this.
BrowserSep 5, 2008 @ 11:50 am
Wait hang on, becoming a parent is not about rescuing someone whatever you become a parent through adoption or not.
THANK YOU!!!
anon 11:27...i agree...dogs love you no matter what, you cant embarass them, and they never get mad at you or tell you that they hate you. animals really are the best. and as for riviera.....dogs and kids arent the same thing...your right. because kids dont get gassed when there are too many of them..animals do. you wanna save a life. adopt an ANIMAL.
I dont want kids period. So obviously I do think they have something with the whole "too many people for the planet" idea BUT who am I to tell someone they cant procreate. There are so many ways to argue each side of this discussion and I would encourage everyone to try and see the other side.
Semi ObsessedSep 5, 2008 @ 01:32 pm
I think being a parent means different things to different people. I don't see anything wrong with her use of the word 'rescue' when referring to adoption. If 'rescuing a child' through adoption means providing that child with a stable environment with all needs met and unconditional love, then that's great! As packed as our planet is right now, imagine, forty or fifty years from now. There'll be even more people then. I think it's wonderful that some people are more interested in adopting than having their own children. That being said, I also don't think it's selfish to have biological children. What I think is selfish is people who are having five, six, or more children these days. You gotta think about how your need to mass reproduce is going to impact others and the environment. A few decades ago it was OK having large biological families. My mom has five siblings. But the people who are starting to have kids RIGHT NOW should be responsible about the number of people they are putting into the world. You might think you have the right to have a million biological children if you want, but grow up already and think about something bigger than your own wants. I'd hope to have a biological child, and adopt.
I think being a parent means different things to different people. I don't see anything wrong with her use of the word 'rescue' when referring to adoption. If 'rescuing a child' through adoption means providing that child with a stable environment with all needs met and unconditional love, then that's great! As packed as our planet is right now, imagine, forty or fifty years from now. There'll be even more people then. I think it's wonderful that some people are more interested in adopting than having their own children. That being said, I also don't think it's selfish to have biological children. What I think is selfish is people who are having five, six, or more children these days. You gotta think about how your need to mass reproduce is going to impact others and the environment. A few decades ago it was OK having large biological families. My mom has five siblings. But the people who are starting to have kids RIGHT NOW should be responsible about the number of people they are putting into the world. You might think you have the right to have a million biological children if you want, but grow up already and think about something bigger than your own wants. I'd hope to have a biological child, and adopt.
I think being a parent means different things to different people. I don't see anything wrong with her use of the word 'rescue' when referring to adoption. If 'rescuing a child' through adoption means providing that child with a stable environment with all needs met and unconditional love, then that's great! As packed as our planet is right now, imagine, forty or fifty years from now. There'll be even more people then. I think it's wonderful that some people are more interested in adopting than having their own children. That being said, I also don't think it's selfish to have biological children. What I think is selfish is people who are having five, six, or more children these days. You gotta think about how your need to mass reproduce is going to impact others and the environment. A few decades ago it was OK having large biological families. My mom has five siblings. But the people who are starting to have kids RIGHT NOW should be responsible about the number of people they are putting into the world. You might think you have the right to have a million biological children if you want, but grow up already and think about something bigger than your own wants. I'd hope to have a biological child, and adopt.
I think being a parent means different things to different people. I don't see anything wrong with her use of the word 'rescue' when referring to adoption. If 'rescuing a child' through adoption means providing that child with a stable environment with all needs met and unconditional love, then that's great! As packed as our planet is right now, imagine, forty or fifty years from now. There'll be even more people then. I think it's wonderful that some people are more interested in adopting than having their own children. That being said, I also don't think it's selfish to have biological children. What I think is selfish is people who are having five, six, or more children these days. You gotta think about how your need to mass reproduce is going to impact others and the environment. A few decades ago it was OK having large biological families. My mom has five siblings. But the people who are starting to have kids RIGHT NOW should be responsible about the number of people they are putting into the world. You might think you have the right to have a million biological children if you want, but grow up already and think about something bigger than your own wants. I'd hope to have a biological child, and adopt.
I agreed with you , the first time
OK I don't know how that ended up on there four times. I guess I mass reproduced my comment. lol.
LOL!!! Good one!!
Occasional VisitorSep 5, 2008 @ 02:48 pm
Pink/I didnt mean dogs and kids are the same thing I meant the whole being open to adopting something usually starts with a pet or even a foster child. What a bunch of righteous bitches you guys just proved your selfs to be. Way to show you total ignorance and not really HEAR what someone is saying.
Adoption isn't that easy if you want a newborn. International adoption isn't that easy either. I'm sure it helps if you're loaded with cash but I've watched many women struggle with infertility and try that route just to end up with empty arms. It's very frustrating, these children need good homes, I wish they'd make it easier for loving couples/people to give those children the love they need.
BrowserSep 5, 2008 @ 02:21 pm
To those who think that the world is over-populated - maybe it is in China or India, but it certainly isn't in the Western world. Europe's population is dying out. Birthrates are the lowest in Italy, Spain and Germany. There is a much larger old popultion to birth ratio. The only reason the US and Canada are doing decently population-wise is because of immigration. However, even in countries where there is a large brith rate (China), they are in trouble as well because they are choosing to have male babies instead of female babies. It will cause a concern several years from now. I don't know why everyone thinks there are too many babies out there. Do your homework, society is dying out and it's a fact.
Occasional VisitorSep 5, 2008 @ 02:56 pm
Post new comment