momster said: Yikes! Anybody know of any divorces that got nasty b/c the WOMAN was the main breadwinner? My poor brain just can't recall any (maybe Reese & Ryan - not that it got nasty - but I don't remember details about that one) and just out of curiosity I wonder how differently it would go vs. the MAN being the main breadwinner....
Booyah said: Yup, mine. Thank goodness no kids were involved. First hubby had to be paid to go away. Why is divorce so expensive? Because it is worth it.
Booyah said: I am sure for the dignity of the kids it will be quick and quiet. Seriously, they have enough that neither could spend half in one lifetime, probably not an eighth in one lifetime. They seem classier than that in terms of the family, can't believe I used that word in speaking about Madge. But about the family, she does seem to put the kids first. Let's hope for the kids sake they do the right thing.
CapturingLife said: I don't think this will get ugly, either. I am sure they've already got the details worked out for a while now. For the sake of the kids, I hope it goes over smoothly and the kids come out of it as best they can.
9345 points Can't Help MyselfOct 15, 2008 @ 01:23 pm
Sorcha said: Is she stupid. When you have that much money, no matter how in "love" you are, you always, ALWAYS should as get a prenup. It's commen sense.
Jan said: I cant help but think how the kids must feel :-( No doubt there was truth to the whole breakup rumours when they were adopting David. Sure he will probably have a better life with them than in Africa but doesnt this mean they in fact lied ( by omission ) to the court saying they had a happy home for him to go to?
Anonymous (not verified) said: I would think it would be considered perjury if they have lied to the court during the 18 month adoption process , which they must have . I would like to see that investigated .
Ashlynn (not verified) said: Yeah, everyone seems to think this will get nasty, but if there's any word you can use to describe Madonna it's professional. When it comes to anything serious- her career, her family- she's the epitome of professionalism. She's not Britney Spears! Her divorce from Sean Penn, which had become an awful relationship, was even done quickly and quietly, and she was almost 20 years younger then, with no kids. It's obvious she is very protective of her children and wants to do what's best for them.
mary (not verified) said: holy crap. that's insane. who doesn't get a pre nup in hollywood these days? i'm sure madonna will be fine though. i bet she has the best lawyers money can buy.
iowa girl said: I think Guy has too much integrity. He has always made his own money. However, I think he should get a chunk of cash simply because he deserves it. why you ask? eh, no other reason than I think she has embarassed him and herself over this past year with the A-Rod deal. So what if they were privately separated...she chose to keep that quiet. She should have also chose to keep her legs closed.
Bernadetteoc said: Madonna believes in Karma right??? Here comes a big heaping dose. I just feel for their children, especially that new little baby boy they just adopted. How sad for them.
LJR (not verified) said: I think he deserves half or whatever the law happens to be. I think she is a crabby biatch, so I think he deserves a lot. Plus, it was a slap to his face when she was seen with A-Rod and now it is coming out that they are romantically involved. It seems that Guy is a real gentleman, always by her side. He probably wanted to be in a more "leader" role in their marriage and she split. I also think she seems like she could shove opinions/values down his throat and if he doesn't comply then she would leave him. I just don't like her. I would date Guy though, he is attractive!!
Nanea said: They got married in Europe, so different laws apply, laws that don't award one spouse half of everything - even if the Heather Mills case made it look differently. Courts usually add up what was earned during the marriage by both parties, and divide that by half, with special provisions for what the kids need and so on, like how long were the partners separated before the divorce was filed. And Guy is not poor either.
Anonymous123 (not verified) said: he certainly deserves half of Madonna's income during their marriage...afterall she was the one that cheated on him and I'm sure it was her decision to get out of the marriage.
kiki said: a-rod is known for being nothing but a womanizer who cheated on his wife all though out their marriage. so if she is leaving her husband for him then she is a bigger fool than i thought. i can't wait for a-rod to give her a taste of everything his wife went through. i just can't see anything remotely attractive in this woman. her face is ugly and her arms are disgusting. hell, they must know something i don't. he should get half-she publicly humilated this man by cheating on him.
Miss_M said: I think Guy Ritchie is not as shallow as other people (Heather Mills) and will probably not take a penny from her. It's not that he's a poor guy!
We are slowly rolling out this points collecting feature. Jump on board and get a head start at accumulating points while it's still in phase 1. Here are some things you can do on I'm Not Obsessed which will increase your balance:
1. Signing up for a user account: 300
2. Logging in: 20
3. Adding a friend to your Buddylist: 10
4. Posting a comment: 5
5. Uploading a photo to your profile: 5
6. Visiting the Beauty and Fashion section: 20
To see all the ways you can earn points on INO, click here.
I hope he gets it all!!!! ~~Team Guy
if its true that they are divorcing, I have a feeling its going to end quickly and quitely.
.
Semi ObsessedOct 15, 2008 @ 03:44 pm
Yikes! Anybody know of any divorces that got nasty b/c the WOMAN was the main breadwinner? My poor brain just can't recall any (maybe Reese & Ryan - not that it got nasty - but I don't remember details about that one) and just out of curiosity I wonder how differently it would go vs. the MAN being the main breadwinner....
Occasional VisitorOct 15, 2008 @ 01:05 pm
nick and jessica...britney and k-fed...
Occasional VisitorOct 15, 2008 @ 01:26 pm
Christie Brinkley
Semi ObsessedOct 15, 2008 @ 01:44 pm
Yup, mine. Thank goodness no kids were involved. First hubby had to be paid to go away. Why is divorce so expensive? Because it is worth it.
Semi ObsessedOct 15, 2008 @ 03:44 pm
I seriously doubt this is true... how could it be?? But in the event that it is, I agree with giedre.
Occasional VisitorOct 15, 2008 @ 01:12 pm
i think it is true...no prenup...
I am sure for the dignity of the kids it will be quick and quiet. Seriously, they have enough that neither could spend half in one lifetime, probably not an eighth in one lifetime. They seem classier than that in terms of the family, can't believe I used that word in speaking about Madge. But about the family, she does seem to put the kids first. Let's hope for the kids sake they do the right thing.
Semi ObsessedOct 15, 2008 @ 01:19 pm
she has more money than she could ever use anyway, what does she care?
BrowserOct 15, 2008 @ 01:22 pm
They are celebs & they knew what they were getting into without a pre-nup. **StrobeLights Make Everything Sexier**
Occasional VisitorOct 15, 2008 @ 01:22 pm
I don't think this will get ugly, either. I am sure they've already got the details worked out for a while now. For the sake of the kids, I hope it goes over smoothly and the kids come out of it as best they can.
Can't Help MyselfOct 15, 2008 @ 01:23 pm
Is she stupid. When you have that much money, no matter how in "love" you are, you always, ALWAYS should as get a prenup. It's commen sense.
BrowserOct 15, 2008 @ 01:33 pm
I cant help but think how the kids must feel :-( No doubt there was truth to the whole breakup rumours when they were adopting David. Sure he will probably have a better life with them than in Africa but doesnt this mean they in fact lied ( by omission ) to the court saying they had a happy home for him to go to?
Semi ObsessedOct 15, 2008 @ 01:34 pm
I would think it would be considered perjury if they have lied to the court during the 18 month adoption process , which they must have . I would like to see that investigated .
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
BrowserOct 15, 2008 @ 01:35 pm
Yeah, everyone seems to think this will get nasty, but if there's any word you can use to describe Madonna it's professional. When it comes to anything serious- her career, her family- she's the epitome of professionalism. She's not Britney Spears! Her divorce from Sean Penn, which had become an awful relationship, was even done quickly and quietly, and she was almost 20 years younger then, with no kids. It's obvious she is very protective of her children and wants to do what's best for them.
holy crap. that's insane. who doesn't get a pre nup in hollywood these days? i'm sure madonna will be fine though. i bet she has the best lawyers money can buy.
I can't see it happening. I don't think Guy is like that.
Semi ObsessedOct 15, 2008 @ 02:09 pm
I think Guy has too much integrity. He has always made his own money. However, I think he should get a chunk of cash simply because he deserves it. why you ask? eh, no other reason than I think she has embarassed him and herself over this past year with the A-Rod deal. So what if they were privately separated...she chose to keep that quiet. She should have also chose to keep her legs closed.
BrowserOct 15, 2008 @ 02:43 pm
Madonna believes in Karma right??? Here comes a big heaping dose. I just feel for their children, especially that new little baby boy they just adopted. How sad for them.
BrowserOct 15, 2008 @ 03:12 pm
I think he deserves half or whatever the law happens to be. I think she is a crabby biatch, so I think he deserves a lot. Plus, it was a slap to his face when she was seen with A-Rod and now it is coming out that they are romantically involved. It seems that Guy is a real gentleman, always by her side. He probably wanted to be in a more "leader" role in their marriage and she split. I also think she seems like she could shove opinions/values down his throat and if he doesn't comply then she would leave him. I just don't like her. I would date Guy though, he is attractive!!
They got married in Europe, so different laws apply, laws that don't award one spouse half of everything - even if the Heather Mills case made it look differently. Courts usually add up what was earned during the marriage by both parties, and divide that by half, with special provisions for what the kids need and so on, like how long were the partners separated before the divorce was filed. And Guy is not poor either.
Semi ObsessedOct 15, 2008 @ 03:51 pm
he certainly deserves half of Madonna's income during their marriage...afterall she was the one that cheated on him and I'm sure it was her decision to get out of the marriage.
Ahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa that is so stupid of her!
a-rod is known for being nothing but a womanizer who cheated on his wife all though out their marriage. so if she is leaving her husband for him then she is a bigger fool than i thought. i can't wait for a-rod to give her a taste of everything his wife went through. i just can't see anything remotely attractive in this woman. her face is ugly and her arms are disgusting. hell, they must know something i don't. he should get half-she publicly humilated this man by cheating on him.
Occasional VisitorOct 15, 2008 @ 09:18 pm
Prenups are not legally binding in England.
Wow, he's going to be loaded.
I think Guy Ritchie is not as shallow as other people (Heather Mills) and will probably not take a penny from her. It's not that he's a poor guy!
BrowserOct 16, 2008 @ 07:56 am
Post new comment