A Wedding For Angelina Jolie And Brad Pitt?

Anonymous (not verified) said:
What a nasty witch! no one cares if these 2 ****s get married. i hope brad cheats on her with a costar once they get married. nice nose job angie! also what a fing hypocrite to diss her dad like that for the SAME reasons she did to jennifer aniston. aniston is hot and in shape unlike angies kangaroo stratched out somach...haha

Anonymous (not verified) said:
for the love of god will this woman never STFU about her perfect life? stop believing your own hype, mangie. you aren't a modern day mother teresa.

Anonymous (not verified) said:
Why does this story resurface every time Angelina has a new movie out?

lis said:
I find that statement to be very obnoxious... usually I like Angelina.

Anonymous (not verified) said:
The Daily Beast, Tina Brown’s new website, has a slightly snarky essay about Angelina Jolie titled, “She’s Actually Smart.” It’s based on Angelina’s comments at the Council on Foreign Relations on Friday to open a panel discussion that I was on. Well, of course she’s smart. I find the snarkiness condescending, a reflection of the general snobbiness in the humanitarian community about celebrities trying to do good work. The assumption is that if the tabloids have an interest in who someone might be sleeping with, that person is an airhead. In fact, of course, there are smart celebrities and dumb ones; there are those who try to rehabilitate a sullied image by feigning an interest in AIDS or poverty, and there are those who genuinely care. There needn’t be any pejorative presumption about a celebrity’s intellect or commitment just because he or she is a great actor. And on the whole, the celebrity interest in Africa and global poverty has been a terrific thing, and there are lots of people alive today because of their involvement. Some of them also really know what they’re talking about. Bono knows G-8 poverty policy issues better than I do. Mia Farrow beat the news media in getting good photographs of the Janjaweed in Darfur. Ashley Judd has been to rural Bihar, India, to learn about sex trafficking. Ben Affleck knows Congo and South Sudan inside out. George Clooney has done more for Darfur than the White House National Security Council. And Angelina Jolie has traveled and visited with refugees and desperate people all over, including three trips to the greater Darfur area, if I remember right. That’s two more trips than Condi Rice has made. (Note to stars out there looking for good causes: one of the great issues that is sitting out there, unclaimed, is maternal mortality — the half million women each year who die in childbirth simply because they are poor, rural and female. Oprah Winfrey has tackled maternal health at the edges, in Ethiopia, but it’s a vast problem that never gets adequate attention. So grab it!) One of the perennial problems for humanitarian crises is that no one pays attention, and so these crises never get resources. That’s partly a problem of the news media, especially television, and partly a problem of politicians who just aren’t interested in distant problems that don’t have quick-fix solutions. But celebrities carry a spotlight with them, and if they can use some of that glow to highlight the needs of Darfur, Congo or Chad, that saves lives. Frankly, if a celebrity isn’t genuinely interested in poverty and is simply trying to get good press, there are better ways to do it. Traveling to Darfur or Congo is dangerous, expensive and uncomfortable, and the outhouses have bats, scorpions and camel spiders. But if a celebrity is willing to put up with such challenges, he or she can get public attention in a way that no one else can. I once was on a panel where Angelina’s eyes filled up as she spoke of Iraqi refugees she had met in Syria; for anybody who was there, that scene was worth 100 of my columns. And ditto for her speech on Friday at the Council on Foreign Relations. So let’s lay off the snarkiness. Until we have an administration that cares about these issues, we have to accept moral leadership where we can find it — and that includes celebrities who care.

Sarah O. said:
Well, if that's what makes them happy then good for them. Just shut up about it. We know you're ''perfect'' and all.

Fashionsmashion said:
She has been making alot of stupid comments as of lately. Like the one were her kids playing with knives and guns. And all before her movie comes out.

Stephanie B said:
I have written a quote she can use next time she gives an interview: "We did everything backwards. Can you believe it? Aren't we just so crazy and innovative? I invented the concept of having kids, adopting kids, as well as the idea of not getting married. I am such a trendsetter! And look I had twins and now it's a fad. I am going to talk constantly about how my newborns, who are way too young to even have significant personalities yet, are acting just like me and Brad. The media will love that! God, I'm original!"

Aja (not verified) said:
Why does the owner of this site care if Angelina isn't married? Get a life of your own honey and quit judging everybody else.

Brianne (not verified) said:
Ofcourse she says the same thing all the time, because **gasp** she gets asked the same questions all the time! Why do people think that the way that she lives her life somehow diminishes their own choices!? It's really not that big of a deal that they chose to have kids before they got married, this puritan american ideal of marriage then babies is outdated, if thats how YOU want to live, cool. but why let it ruin your day if others don't choose to do the same!!?

Brianne (not verified) said:
I am mid 20's and I don't apologize for it, I was simply stating that it is truly ridiculous that to be "normal" and acceptable in society today (especially when there are children involved) that it has become this requirement to be married. Having children and being in love and nurturing said love is a major commitment, that commitment does not change simply because the state sanctions it with a peice of paper and a different tax braket.