
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are all set to walk down the aisle and adopt another baby soon. Why do I have the biggest sense of deja vu...oooh, maybe it's because we read about this story Every. Single. Week. in the rags!
Ok reports:
“Angelina has always toyed with the idea of getting married to Brad. She’s always followed her gut instincts in life, love and family. As the kids get older and they add to their brood, they want to make as few complications as possible.”
But, the wedding won't be a crazy glam affair.
"Don't expect some lavish Hollywood wedding. And neither of them are religious, so it will be simple."
Really, I should stop even reporting on this as news, but the one week I don't mention it they'll get married and I'll have missed out on the story of the century. Although, truthfully we have been hearing more marriage buzz than usual. Where there's smoke...
So who knows, maybe this time it's actually happening. What do you think?
At least if they do finally get married it will show commitment. Living together is a statement that they're not sure; that they're not really committed.Just living together without being married also isn't setting a good example for the kids.They should get married and make it right.
no disrespect to your opinion but, i was raised a roman catholic and still believe firmly in many of the sacraments. however after being married and then divorced i think there's a lot more to be said for two people being committed to each other than there is to adhering to some social standard of what commitment is. i'm sure everyone already knows that "marriage" as it's defined now was established as a legal standard to determine the ownership and division of property and was not intended to be an expression of love and devotion. these two seem to have a working understanding of each other and their joint goals for the children and honestly that's what's important. a lot of times putting at title on something just ruins it. Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell have a GREAT relationship...and NO paperwork. Marriage isn't for everyone.
The difference is that when someone gets married it "ruins" it because it isn't sin anymore. Sin is fun... but only for a season. Of course nobody reads the Bible anymore, but in the end times when the earth starts quaking and locusts start stinging like scorpions and the antichrist makes everyone taks his mark on their hand or forehead, the Bible will be the only place to turn for eternal answers and to find out what happens next. People want to live today however they want with no strings attached. Grant it if men were half of what they should be, there would be a lot less divorce in the country, but women are so career motivated and dont' respect their men anymore..... living together doesn't make it right, it is sin that's the only reason it seems to work out better.
I'm not married, but I live with my fiance and we're more committed then most of the married people I know. To me your comment seems out dated and somewhat ignorant.
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 01:40 pm
I am so over these two.
I'll wait and see, I think they will eventually get married....eventually.
Pogue Mahone (not verified) said: At least if they do finally get married it will show commitment. Living together is a statement that they're not sure; that they're not really committed." I beg to differ. I've been living with my boyfriend for 5 years and we are as together as can be. However, we are getting married next year. But everyone is different....I'm just saying that in my case, even if we weren't getting married, we'd still be together just as much as if we were. Could be the same with them.
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 01:24 pm
P.S. I never believe anything OK Magazine states.
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 01:24 pm
Like she said in a recent interview, you generally can't adopt a new child until all children in the household are AT LEAST 6 months of age. I think we've got at least, say, 4 months?
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 01:39 pm
I am over them. They are not that great.
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 01:48 pm
love a wedding and love babies!!
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 01:48 pm
Imagine Ive been living with my fiance for almost 17 years and engaged for almost 5 of those. Who knew we werent as committed as my sister who isnt with her husband after 10 years of marriage.
Semi ObsessedOct 29, 2008 @ 01:50 pm
what the source?? They are that great!
I still won't "apologize" for having morals and values. Even if the rest of the world thinks it's ok to shack up I disagree.If you truly love someone and are committed, then there's no reason to not get married.There shouldn't be any hesitation if you're sure...
"shacking up" is NOT what they are doing. This is a loving family and in no way does their commitment to one another depend on a legal document. I AM married and it was NO different than when we werent, out commitment is exactly the same. I only got married so I could have the same last name as my children.
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 02:59 pm
All "shacking up" means is they're living together but not married. I personally LIKE Brad and Angelina; it would just be nice to see them get married.
couldn't they all just go away and live on an island somewhere so we don't have to hear about their perfection anymore? please.
I'm with ya!
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 02:45 pm
There's still something to be said for traditional marriage. I think the older generation had it right when they referred to living together as "living in sin".It's not just a "piece of paper"; it's a solemn oath and commitment to eachother in the presence of God.People are more likely to work harder at staying together if it's not as easy to just walk away. Marriage is good for society and for raising children.It is stability,and the cornerstone of any successful civilization, Take away, devalue, or redefine marriage and your society collapses.
Couldn't have said it better.
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 02:24 pm
I didnt make any type of commitment in front of God. I made a promise to my now husband. Promises and legal documents ARE NOT THE SAME THING.
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 03:00 pm
I will never knock anyone who wants to get married in the church in front of friends and god. Someone has to keep paying all those tithe's to keep the leaders rich !
Semi ObsessedOct 29, 2008 @ 03:10 pm
Living together without being married is just plain sleazy and immoral.
No one is asking for an apology. How about being a little open minded? and stop criticizing someone just because they don't share your same believes? Also "Anonymous"you don' t have to read anything you don't want, but of course you will so you can put worthless 2 cents in. You strike me as some one who always HAS to be invited to a party so people won't hear you bitch afterwards.
I don't want to be so "open minded" that my brains fall out!
There's a narcissist for you! She craves attention for herself and has a very inflated sense of herself to say the least. Everytime her movie is out, she's jetting off somewhere, making important announcements about her life, etc. I always say, what happens when her beauty fades? What happens when people don't care anymore about what she does? Watch out Brad, that's when she'll get dangerous. This woman needs help so badly, I hope she gets it. I feel for her.
I agree she has issues. She is adopting all these children to fill some void in her life. She needs help fast.
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 02:23 pm
one mag says they are getting married, another says he is falling for a co-star...who cares anymore?!
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 02:29 pm
Hadn't heard that one yet but he did it before and more than likely he will do it again.
BrowserOct 29, 2008 @ 02:31 pm
he might be falling for a co-star then jolie gets insecure knowing this is how they met and to secure her price they plan on getting married . No matter what they say they will both always be insecure and jealous of their co-stars, and I see Jolie as the possessive-jealous type and that never makes a healthy relationship.
Occasional VisitorOct 29, 2008 @ 07:53 pm
Post new comment