Angelina Jolie looked AMAZING on the cover of Cosmopolitan for Germany. I mean, check out that body! That’s what happens when you run around all day after 6 children. You have no time to gain weight!
Nothing new to say about her, the post is completely gratuitous.
On a side note, does Angelina wear nail polish typically? I don’t think she does.
Photo by ONTD
UPDATE: I also found a picture of Angelina on the cover of In Style. Which do you prefer?
Lady and the Blog BabyRazzi Daddy Details
Ads by:
I'm Not Obsessed is a website which focuses on the entertainment and lifestyle needs of today's woman.
The INO blog family includes ImNotObsessed.com and Lady and the Blog.
I'm Not Obsessed offers work-safe and family-friendly insight into the latest celebrity gossip, paparazzi photos, and up-to-the minute pop culture news. Lady and the Blog focuses on fashion, family and food. We offer beauty and fashion reviews, shopping trends, designer previews, and full runway coverage. We even help our readers obtain the celebrity look and the celebrity look for less. Lady and the Blog provides our readers with the latest in family news, product reviews,steals and deals and features great buys from online retailers. LEGAL DISCLAIMER AND IMNOTOBSESSED.COM TERMS OF USE.
In today’s day and age, they are ALL photoshopped, Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston included. This is nothing new. In the past, it was airbrushing. And the truth is, we want to see them phtoshopped, not the way they really are. So, what is the big deal?
I was gonna say, this picture looks like one from about 5 years ago. She does look good though!
ewe she is sooo nasrty!! her hair looks so fake! anyways wanted sucks! her crusted lips take up the whole screen. also she has a NASTY backside, flat flapjack backside….ewe!!!
the only reason she looks so amazing is because of all the photoshopping. sorry, but you can tell just by looking at it. she looks way better photoshopped heavily like on german cosmo rather than that instyle cover. ugh
amazing lady
She is most beautiful in and out
“That’s what happens when you run around all day after 6 children. You have no time to gain weight!”
Or it’s what happens when you undergo a ‘mummytuck’!
With all of her money and even with the crazy amount of photoshop Angelina Jolie still needs a generous dab of lip salve on her nasty dry lips!
photoshop ? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
she’s E.T.
photoshop it’s not enough perhaps for we
too much photoshop!
what’s on her lip?
german photo is so photoshopped they even erased the birthmark she has on top of her right eye… i only know this because i happen to have one on the same spot and no make up can cover it up. you can see her birthmark in the instyle magazine
Iowa girl, Angelina look 1000 time better than you, photoshop or not!
You Brangelunatics sure take this blog thing way too seriously…LOL. Get a grip, repeat after me “is only a blog, is only a blog, I should not let negative comments about my queen Angelina get to me…is only a blog” now take two crazy pills and log off the internet.
she looks very plastic on this cover
she sweats jen aniston. now trangelina is trying to act all sexy? too bad shes not! she also copied jen by showing her flapjack A$$ in wanted, as jen did in the break up!
You would think they would have photoshopped that thing on her bottom lip- it looks like a blue mark
Yep, I’ve gotta agree, she looks fabulous. I like the German cover much beter.
ah yes, the wonders of plastic surgery and photoshop. put this skank next to a real woman like charlize theron and we’ll see how beautiful she is.
The Angelina on the German cover is 5-10 years younger than the Angelina on the InStyle cover. Just sayin’.
yeah. just look at the noses. HAHAHHAHAHHAAHA
Nice tan…
I much prefered the photo on In Style as it wasn’t so horribly “photo shopped” as the German cover of Cosmo was. The Cosmo cover looked like Angelina Jolie’s sister might look if she were 10 years younger …. and existed of course! The In Style photo looked more like her, with minor touch ups. In it you could recognize where she’d had the tip of her nose shaved, and i have to say it’s much prettier this way! Nothing wrong with making some improvements on Mother Nature. Either way, she looks better than when on ET or other news programs walking the carpets looking worn out, tired and haggard. There is hope that six kids won’t wear her down after all…..
Cover with blue dress = blue eyes; cover with green dresses = green eyes. Yay for photoshop! Anyway, she’s always pretty.
cosmo…even tho it’s really airbrushed…it’s just more glam…
She has two moles on the left side of her face on the INSTYLE cover… none on the COSMO… just sayin!
it looks good, except Angelina does not have tan, is skinnier that the cover photo, and looks more age appropriate. On the cover she looks 25, in real life she looks about 35 due to her tal and skinny frame. However Angelina does look good in real life, although I find her annoying. Somehow her darker hair now is really complimenting her skin. Perhaps everybody noticed how her man-floormat-Brad changed his haircolor for dark brown as well.
well…where are her tattoos?
they are photoshopped in both of these mags!
She’s really pretty on both cover, photoshopped or not!
I’d like to see the before and after pictures of her cover of Shape!
Visit my fashion blog!
This photo is EXACTLY the same as one used on Australian Cosmo 4 years ago!!! Exactly the same! i still have a copy- is that even legal?
WOW WOW WOW!!!
Yuk, yuk, yuk!
After seeing how much Jessica Alba was Photoshop for her ad campaign I would love to see the original picture of Angelina. Sorry not buying this picture.
I’m finding it hard to enthuse about posed shots because of the amount of photoshop that’s being done….but if she’s close to this her body looks great. I wouldn’t mind having a thigh like that. Is it just me, though, or is there something off about the color of her lips? My eye keeps being drawn to a blotchy spot in the middle of her lower lip. Looks odd to me.
LOL that photo is 4 years old. Nice try, Cosmo.
Really? Good catch.
anonymous 8:34, show us youre face and body and what you think of it!!!!!!
By the way, WHOS NOT photoshop this days!!!!!!!!!!!! The girl is gorgeous photoshop or not!!
Grow up! This is a gossip site. She is not beautiful to me. Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Lame brangeloonie.
I don’t care how old this photo is, I think she looked stunning then and still does.
this is sooooo 1988!!
Her face looks good here must be air brushed. Because thats not what we are seeing now.
PHOTOSHOP BIGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG TIME SHE IS SO UGLY, OLD , RUNDOWN WITH STRECHMARKS AND VEINS ALL OVER HER FACE AND BODY, PHOTOSHOP BIG TIME.
FAKE FAKE FAKE BIG TIME SHE CAN’T FULL SMART PEOPLE WE CAN’T GET FOOL MAYBE THE SITES WHO SHE PAY THEM TO POST HER PICTURE AND SAY NICE THINGS ABOUT HER BUT PEOPLE KNOW SHE IS ONE OLD UGLY HAG.
Vera, I know you try to keep it positive, but I have to tell you…sometimes your comments sound moronic. If you really think that’s Angelina’s unretouched body in that photo, you are crazy. Everyone–everyone—is photoshopped on covers now.
And one more thing…the Cosmo cover photo is old, like everyone’s saying. It’s before she had her nosejob. Look how much wider the bridge of her nose is in that photo than it is now.
HATERS!!! Shes one of the most beautiful women and sex symbol of all time in hollywood…like her or not!!!haha!!haters!!
ANd yes shes photoshopped like every body…even chiniston!!!!
i prefer neither of the covers all airbrushed