Sienna Miller was lovely in red as she posed for photographers before heading into the screening of “The Mysteries of Pittsburgh” in New York last night.The IMDb has the movie listed as released in 2008, but the official launch date is April 10th of 2009.
Based on Michael Chabon’s novel, the film chronicles the defining
summer of a recent college graduate who crosses his gangster father and
explores love, sexuality, and the enigmas surrounding his life and his
city.
Sound interesting? What do you guys think of Sienna’s classic red dress?
Photos by INF
The dress is a beautiful color but I don’t like the shape of it (or the wearer)! And lose the opaque tights!
My husband cheated on me and I wasted a lot of time hating the skank he cheated with. Finally, I realized that he was the one who had promised to “love, honor, and cherish” me and she didn’t force him into anything. Still, she is a skank.
Her feet look awkward… like Paris Hilton’s always do
The skanks are worthy of hate because if they had any morals or decency, if they know the guy is married, would refuse to get involved with him. It says a lot about the women who get involved with these men. If a guy has so little regard for his wife and the mother of his children, what does that say about him, and the woman who goes for him?
OMG tights and open toe shoes are one of my biggest fashion pet peeves! I just don’t get it. Regardless of how big of a tr@mp she is, she’s still a beautiful woman (as much as I hate to admit that lol)!
I’m so tired that the issue of “sleeping with a married man” always comes up when there is a post about Sienna Miller. He could have said no, you know? He didn’t need to sleep with her. After all, she was single, HE was the married one with a wife that apparently didn’t understand him and from whom he was separated. Why does that make Sienna a tramp? She’s young and not married and has had a few boyfriends, nothing wrong with that.
The issue of her sleeping with the married man keeps coming up for the following reasons:
1) SM is still popping up in LA or at LAX. Considering that she pulled these same stunts last year, it stands to reason that she is still sleeping with the married man and using these “business trips to LA” to let everyone and RG and her 4 kids know that she”won”. Since the married man still has not filed for a divorce/legal separation, any photo-op with him is still INSENSITIVE. Being 2009, isn’t going to make the affair any less insensitive.
2) SM is always the victim and is never ever responsible for what happens to her. Case in point, she is sleeping with another woman’s husband and then has the nerve to whine about there being no sisterhood. Since she was so “kind” to point out how women have been unsisterly to her, both women and men bring up SM actions with the married man to demonstate how unsisterly she is being to another sister.
3) People diminishing/ignoring SM actions by using the “not the married one” excuse is not valid. This in itself is a DOUBLE STANDARD, for it implies that women do not have to take responsibility/accoutability for THEIR actions and that they don’t have to respect the marriages/relationships of other women. Since SM is a 27 yo ADULT woman and not a child, she is responsible for her VERY OWN ACTIONS (not RG, BG, the media, or other women). She should have walked away or said no, go home to your wife, or wait until your divorce; she did not have to sleep/flaunt her affair with a married man. SM is EQUALLY responsible because she is encouraging him to dishonor his vows.
The issue of her sleeping with the married man keeps coming up for the following reasons:
4) Some people claim that they wouldn’t get mad at the other woman, but that does not work in SM favor because she was documented making a threat against JL nanny. So by the “don’t get mad at the other woman’ excuse, SM had no right to publicly threaten JL nanny because she wasn’t the one that made the promise to SM and as a single woman can do anything she wants. So you see, even SM holds the other woman just as responsible for the affair. She is only whining about being a “victim of double standards” because she thought being SM was enough to make people look the other way.
5) SM, her fans, and her family pretend that no one was hurt by this very public affair. When SM plays the victim, people simply bring up the affair as a reminder that she has no business to complain because she reaped havoc in the lives of 5 innocent human beings and did not once show any consideration for how they would be able to cope with this very public affair. Why would anyone have sympathy for SM, when she couldn’t even muster up an ounce of aympathy for RG and her 4 kids?
The only ones that have ever maintained that BG was “separated”/”that his wife didn’t understand” are SM and her mothers. They came up with these lies to justify SM actions AFTER leaked those “embarassing” photos to expose the affair. Is leaking photos of the married man engaging in “acts” with his mistress an indication that SM doesn’t understand BG? She couldn’t force the married man to file for a divorce, so she went after the married man’s wife.
Why is the issue of “sleeping with the married man” always coming up? Everytime the public sees SM, they are simply reminded of those photos where she allowed the married man to suck/grab her breast and posed naked/topless with the married man while her own mother sat by her side. People would have more sympathy for SM had she shown come consideration to RG/kids and not staged photo-op after photo-op with the married man after those “breast sucking/topless” photos surfaced. .
She is great and looks so beautiful here.. as always!
She looks amazing! I can’t wait to see this movie.
I agree. The red looks astonishing on her and she looks all nice and dressed up, unlike her more casual look.
I hate the dress’ shape. She usually dresses so much better.
She looks so BAD in this outfit… the dress is horrible and the combination red/black is terrible…. ahhhhh someone same her!! And the shoes?????? No words.
Anonymous (not verified) said:
She looks so BAD in this outfit… the dress is horrible and the combination red/black is terrible…. ahhhhh someone save her!! And the shoes?????? No words.
She is great at sleeping with every man that comes within smelling range of her rancid body. The woman is 26 and looks like she’s been rode hard and put away wet. Oh, yeah, she has been rode by other women’s husbands and left. Total skank. She looks good in nothing. Plus one of the worst actresses around. No talent other than showing her body.
She sucks as an ‘actress’. This dress does not fit her well, the shape is awful and the shoes, SERIOUSLY how can you even say she looks good when her damn shoes don’t even fit her. She is just a mess and if I didnt know any better I would think she was 35.
SHE LOOKS AWESOME! YOU ALL ARE JUST HATERSSS!!
What’s not to hate? Morally, she’s a tramp! I’m not saying she needs perfect morals, but just a little morality when it comes to sleeping with married men would help. Would you trust her around your man?
I’d rather be a hater than a complete idiot, which is what you are for defending this piece of trash. Birds of a feather.
She looks like she’s been attacked by a whole container of bronzer! But I will say that she is one of the few women around that can pull of that color red lipstick. (Still can’t stand her though!!!)