Keira Knightley And Sienna Miller Help One Another Not "Google Themselves"

Keira Knightley And Sienna Miller Help One Another Not "Google Themselves"

This is pretty funny. Keira Knightley and Sienna Miller call on one another to help talk her out of finding out what Internet blogs says about her. LOL! Thank goodness for the support of a friend. Sienna says:

"We keep ourselves afloat if things happen
in the media that are hard to deal with, or the awful temptation to Google
yourself comes up, and just being mortified about what people write about
you. She'll phone me up and say, 'I'm thinking about doing it,' and I'm
like, 'I am too... don't do it, don't do it!' And we'll kind of talk each
other out of it. But it's hard sometimes to not want to know what people are
saying behind your back.” 

Would you be able to avoid the temptation? You almost have to in order to remain SANE. Some blogs and boards can be brutal.

Keira takes it a step further and finds the internet as a whole “dehumanizing”. The actress tries to avoid it as much as possible.

"I hate the internet. I find it dehumanizing to constantly check
emails or social sites which have become so fashionable."

She also says she isn't a celebrity and never acts like one around friends and family.

“I am not a celebrity. I don’t go home or out with my friends
saying, ‘I’m a celebrity, and I don’t ask to be treated like a queen. My
parents would not like that."

Sounds like a very grounded individual. That's hard to maintain in this business so it's refreshing to read. 

Keira Knightley And Sienna Miller Help One Another Not "Google Themselves"Keira Knightley And Sienna Miller Help One Another Not "Google Themselves"Keira Knightley And Sienna Miller Help One Another Not "Google Themselves"Keira Knightley And Sienna Miller Help One Another Not "Google Themselves"



COMMENTS...

switchstance5
48675 points
switchstance5 said:

I don't know if I could withstand the pressure TO find out what people are saying about me. But I guess they've done it a couple times and have always read something negative so they have even more reason to not go online and check it out.

Visit my fashion blog!

B B said:

Oh, gosh, I'll be honest. If I were famous I couldn't resist googling myself. Maybe after I'd read enough bad stuff I'd be ready to stop! Remind me to keep my legs together when I exit a car. ;o)

<a href="/user/123" title="View user profile.">CapturingLife</a>
34748 points
CapturingLife said:

I love both of them and they just seem to be such a good "fit" as close friends. :) I would have to ban myself from the internet if I were a celeb. That would be such an awful thing to read all those hateful articles about yourself on a daily basis. Yikes. There's not enough therapy in the world....

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Although I am a self-confessed internet junkie, if I were famous I wouldn't Google myself - hopefully I'd be too busy working to have the time!

<a href="/user/3162" title="View user profile.">gretel</a>
2670 points
gretel said:

She's right, it must be pretty awful always having stories floating around about you. I really don't care about about her personal life, she's pretty & an average actress, so far.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It's hypocritical for her to complain about those things in the press that are difficult for her to handle, when she didn't even care about those things in the press that were difficult for RG and her kids to handle. Did she even care what people were saying behind RG back when they saw those photos of her topless/naked with RG husband, allowing BG to suck/grab on her breasts, or how she continued to stage photo-op after photo-op with the married man even after those topless/breast sucking photos. If she would think before she speaks, people wouldn't have to keep brining up the point that she has no right to complain when she did the exact same thing to an innocent mother and her 4 kids and didn't even muster up an ounce of sympathy/consideration for them. So there are things in the press that are hard to deal with, she can avoid them by making the right decisions (ie-stop tipping off the paps, no more LAX/LA photo-ops until the married man files for a divorce, stop playing the victim).

<a href="/user/278" title="View user profile.">Miss_M</a>
300 points
Miss_M said:

Anonymous above: Why is it that women (I assume you are a woman) always blame "the other woman" for everything that goes wrong in a marriage? We don't know if it was all rosy in the Ghetty family, all we know is the gossip that's written in the papers. So think before you judge someone you don't know at all.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

So what you are basically saying is that people should not take ownership of their actions? You are implying that the other woman has the right to insert herself in another woman's marriage/relationship (because it is "troubled" and doomed to fail anyway) and doesn't have to deal with the consequences of her actions when she participates in affairs. People are going to feel sorry for the woman that is being humilated and betrayed, not the woman that is doing the humilatiating and betrayal. SM didn't endear anyone to her because a) she whined for two years about how her fiance did her wrong, b)she said something about the nanny needing to watch her back, and c) she blamed other women for standing behind RG the REAL VICTIM.

<a href="/user/278" title="View user profile.">Miss_M</a>
300 points
Miss_M said:

Anonymous above: Why is it that women (I assume you are a woman) always blame "the other woman" for everything that goes wrong in a marriage? We don't know if it was all rosy in the Ghetty family, all we know is the gossip that's written in the papers. So think before you judge someone you don't know at all.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Because in the real world (outside of your SM fantasy) ADULTS take responsibility for THEIR actions, they don't "pass the buck". On a similar note, if you stole a shirt from a store, who is responsible? You? Or the store owner because he put the shirt out on display and of course you didn't make any promises to him to not steal? You see how silly that sounds? So arguing that SM is not responsible is just plain silly, she knew he was married so she should have walked away or said no. Just because marriages have their ups and downs that doesn't give any woman the right to sleep with another woman's husband.

So you lecture about believing tabloid gossip and then proceed to talk about how the married man's marriage was in trouble before SM. Where exactly did this info come from, because interesting enough the married man has never said that he was unhappy or that he and his wife were having problems before SM. These "separation, he was not happy, or they were already having problems" LIES were created by none other than the other woman and her mothers to justify her actions with another sister husband, which you yourself have no problem believing. The only one's who need to think before they judge are SM,her and her mothers.

Speaking of thinking before judging, didn't SM MAKE A BIG DEAL OUT OF HER BOYFRIEND CHEATING ON HER WITH THE NANNY? Didn't she threaten JL's nanny? So you see there is no use telling people to not judge the other woman when SM is on record doing the exact same thing.

Didn't SM just blast women for not honoring the sisterhood? Who is she to judge when she had her breats in the mouth of another sister's husband?You needs to think before they judge? SM and her fans of course.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This is the problem with Sienna and her fans, they advocate not taking responsibility for one's actions. Sienna contributed to her dismise and yet all she and her fans do is blame someone else. Why is someone else always to blame for Sienna actions? RG, the media, other women, when does it end? When is Sienna going to be an adult and own up to her actions? BAD:publicly engaging in PDA with a married man; GOOD:waiting until the married man files a divorce/legal separation before engaging in PDA with him.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This is to prove that you are a human, and not a spam bot.
5 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

When commenting, please be respectful to other INO readers. No racial, sexual or homophobic slurs will be tolerated.