*Updated: Sarah Jessica Parker's Twin Girls Are Here
According to WTRF, an Ohio news station, the surrogate for Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick gave birth to the twin girls this morning in Ohio. Sarah and Matthew are reportedly at the hospital.
Security at the hospital is tight this morning. We're told additional
guards have been brought in and even more are on standby, if needed, as
this story is expected to get national attention."
The hospital declined to comment. According to TMZ, Sarah and Matthew are expected to release a statement sometime today.
The girls join James Wilkie, who is six years old.
Congratulations! I can't wait to see Sarah dress these girls!
*Update:
Aaaand, here it is...the statement with the girls' names.
"Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick are delighted to announce
the healthy arrival of their two daughters at 3:58 p.m. on June 22 in
Ohio.""Marion Loretta Elwell Broderick weighed 5 lbs., 11 oz., and Tabitha
Hodge Broderick weighed 6 pounds," the statement continues. "Both Hodge
and Elwell are family names on Parker's side.""The babies are doing beautifully and the entire family is over the moon."
Thoughts?
Photos by Wenn.com
3250 points
DITTTOOOO - Congratulations! I can't wait to see Sarah dress these girls!
The babies are to young to reckognise their horse.........I MEAN MOTHER OFCOURSE.......................thank god!!
Thank you for using the term "reckognise." It really explains a lot.
Yay! Twin marriage band-aids!
19090 points
LMAO thoughts exactly
22875 points
wow. these newborns won't even know their mommy, since they have been in the womb of another woman. good luck getting them acclemated to you Sarah.---em's
7935 points
If this were true no child would be attached to their fathers.
Emches, that is an INCREDIBLY ignorant statement.
3960 points
That's why all adopted children aren't attached to their parents? And no child is close to their father? Wow, I hope you were kidding and aren't that ignorant.
22875 points
wow such hostility you guys all have. i'm just saying, that Sarah and Mathew are in a position that they have nannys and such, having a surrogate mom, your child not being able to hear your voices everyday, those kind of things make it hard for your child to be attached to you. it takes acclemation for them to get adjusted to you. Does Sarah and Matthew have time for this? I hope so.---em's
2660 points
that has nothing to do with it. the newborns are staying with their parents from now on & i'm pretty sue Sarah will have plenty of time to spend with them. A lot of non-celeb women have their babies & have to go work as soon as they get up and that doesn't mean they are not attached to their mothers. i've been with a nanny since i was 2 weeks old & my mother comes first. my nanny is kind of a grandmother to me.
what an ignorant person you are.
7935 points
What are people talking about with this ignorant garbage about SJP not carrying the babies and so they won't know her or get acclemated to her?!
Are you guys kidding??
My dad doesn't have a womb but I'm pretty attached to him as my father figure and family..........
I know how retartded is that!
33912 points
How exciting! Congrats to them!!!
129675 points
I sincerely hope that she doesn't dress her girls the way she dresses James Wilike...its sad that the kid should look like a welfare victim.
Because it will "sincerely" affect you soooo much? Parents are allowed to dress their children however they please, there is no right or wrong way. How in the hell does her son having longer hair and shorter pants make him look like a welfare victim. Maybe it's how he chooses to dress? Think about "Big Daddy" with Adam Sandler. One of the most endearing parts of that movie was that he allowed the son to name and dress himself, it instills a sense of freedom and trust. Taste is subjective, get used to it.
129675 points
Apparently my comment has affected you soooo much. LOL! I can't believe you're seriously comparing real life to a movie. LOL! Taste certainly is subjective and I feel sorry for anyone that dresses that way, especially when his parents are loaded.
No one is comparing real life to a movie. It's an example of how you shouldn't take such trivial things (i.e. clothes) so seriously.
129675 points
Who are you to say what I should and shouldn't take seriously? And I'm sure all the major designers feel exactly the way that you do. ;O)
Aww..... that is so, adorable? xo
2660 points
You should take a look on how horrible a lot of major designers dress themselves ;)
Well I am happy for them even though there are a lot of mean people out there. Welcoming new family members, whether its a baby, in laws, adoption, or marriage, is a joyous occasion.
3525 points
yay congrats for them! how exciting!!! ***annie***
3085 points
I can't wait to see pictues!
25615 points
Congrats to them!!!
15500 points
Congrats to the family!!
Are they Sarah and Matthews biological babies? and I pray being able to dress her daughters up will help poor wilkie in the fight to get a damn hair cut! Congrats! can't wait for pics!
8745 points
twin baby girls, how exciting. can't wait to see pics.
129675 points
I like the names. :O)
5395 points
Wow..... They went old school with the names..... Not the most off the wall names, but why do all celebs need to give their kids 6 names ?
9360 points
really old school!
1895 points
I'm not too crazy about the names.
9920 points
I think the names fit their style. :) James is a very classic name and it flows well with Marion and Tabitha. Not names I'd personally pick - fortunately they aren't my babies!
15500 points
Interesting names.
840 points
I'm so happy for them! I think the names they chose are great.
12475 points
I have to disagree on how she will dress her babies.. she dose not dress that well on a daily basis, but she's happy and comphy... which, it's how she is no biggie.. but her only claim to style comes form sex and the city
2435 points
Congratulations! I don't really like the names but I guess they match with James Wilkie so it must be a family thing
I'm not crazy about the names, but it could've been worse! :)
5870 points
Why did they use a surrogate?
2134155 points
Congratulation to happy family!!! The main thing all ar healthy and happy!:)
11990 points
Congrats to the family. I love the names.
45227 points
How fun!
I was reading your comments about the surrogate mother and how she wouldn't be so attached to the babies... I don't have kids yet but I think there's a lot of bonding to the child for the mother who carries them in their womb. I imagine it would take more time to “feel” those kids as your own. It must be a bit confusing for the mother.
I don’t think surrogating is bad; on the contrary, but maybe a bit emotionally conflicting to the parts involved…
Does anyone know if the twins are both sarah and matthew's biological children or maybe just one or the other's?
What about the surrogate??
Post new comment
When commenting, please be respectful to other INO readers. No racial, sexual or homophobic slurs will be tolerated.