A 32 Minute Film Of James Franco Trashing A Room
Sooooo, here's the deal. There's a 32 minute short film called 'The Room Before and After' where James Franco walks in and literally trashes a room to pieces. That's the entire film - a half hour of James going nuts in this room.
What do you think about the concept? Is it art? Or is it nonsense?













5605 points
What a waste. Stupid.
Oddly, I don't find it as stupid as that episode of "The Hills" I once caught at my dad's house.
35580 points
Are they that desperate and out of ideas? =^_^=
This is what I was thinking, except it was in relation to "I'm a Celebrity: Get Me Out of Here!" ;)
30730 points
it is artsy in a way. As long as it's his own room we're good.
5325 points
I did this once. It wasn't called art though, it was called a nervous breakdown. Hey, I guess I was ahead of my time! LOL
You're a trendsetter!
2770 points
I thought it was funny... but I guess that's my sense of humor. Also, I couldn't help but notice some of the nice things he was destroying...
2810 points
I've always found him attractive, but watching some of this makes him seem douchy.
2755 points
Interesting. Maybe at one point they'll explain the concept behind it. Then it would be time to judge if nonsense or not. Right now, it doesnt make much sense but I wouldnt call it nonsense. (althought thats what this word means literally- i dont know)
It took him 32 minutes? What a slacker. I could have done it in five.
56297 points
I'm going to lean towards nonsense. But it's not like he got high and trashed his hotel room, right? These people probably set this up in a soundstage or something. No more "wasteful" than any other show/movie set that gets blown up or otherwise destroyed.
In other words, I'm keeping an open mind. And sort of laughing. And wondering why it took so long.
stupid
You don't need JAmes Franco to do that. My 19 months old does it every day to our house :) I would prefer to see him putting it back together in 32 minutes (which I do every evening)
6750 points
Nonsense, destructive, what is the purpose of the act?
291890 points
Like usual, I can't see the video at work, but it seems interesting.... I think it would be fun to destroy a room, as long as I wasn't ruining anything of value, and I didn't have to clean it up. :)
5995 points
I think this is better...http://www.acetj.com/videos/player.php?mediaID=2941
5709835 points
Nonsense and this is took 32 minutes?!?!? Maybe the art of it is in the idea of trashing the room slowly and artistically :-))) , otherwise no sense at all .
3750 points
I actually found it very interesting that he didn't go for the shelves first, which is what I would have done. Anyways, I'd watch JF do anything for 32 minutes.
143950 points
If this is art, its not my kind of art.
That was beautiful, my favorite part is at the end where he's laying on the bed lookin' to curl up.
23715 points
Aww man can't watch it!---em's
Stupid. Moronic. Sophomoric. Puerile. Infantile. Silly. At a time when the number of people who show up at soup kitchens has doubled, why are these imbeciles burning up money? If it's in the name of "art", I'll throw up.
wholphin is nutty. i've seen a couple of things starring michael starr, paul rudd, etc... it's the arty stuff that doesn't necessarily bring in the box office dollars.
1470 points
complete nonsense
3085 points
nonsense
11990 points
What a waste of time and money.
1115 points
nonsense.
This is amazing.
If someone asked me to destroy a room I'd do it without a second thought.
I guess this just proves that if you look decent enough, you can be paid to do stupid CRAP :P Ugh.
Post new comment
When commenting, please be respectful to other INO readers. No racial, sexual or homophobic slurs will be tolerated.