Sienna Miller Dislikes Her G.I. Joe Action Figure

Pin It

Sienna Miller should’ve had lunch with Megan Fox before beginning her press tour for her new action movie ‘G.I. Joe: The Rise of the Cobra.’ First she admitted that her acting skills weren’t really utilized in the film (which may be true, but is it the best thing to say?), and now she is publicly criticizing her action figure.

“My doll is cross-eyed and has the biggest chin you have ever seen,”
she told The Sun about the Baroness figurine above. “Action figures are
always a bit off, but front on she looks sort of possessed.”

LOL! Are action figures ever flattering?

And this is on the heels of Sienna’s complaints that the G.I. Joe director complained about her breast size.

“The director said, ‘I’m gonna be honest, I like girls with big boobs’,
and I don’t have them so we made them bigger,” Sienna revealed last
year, apparently much to the chagrin of Stephen [the director], who countered that he
would never, ever say that.”

After Sienna’s past, um, notoriety, something tells me she needs to be on her best behavior for the release of this movie. Although, if she’s telling the truth, then it’s her right to say it, isn’t it?

At least she’s getting the film press, and you know what people say, the worst publicity is no publicity!

Do Sienna’s statements influence your interest in ‘G.I. Joe: The Rise of the Cobra’? Do you find her honesty refreshing?

Photos by INF

Check out my other online properties!!

This entry was posted in Celebrity Interviews and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Sienna Miller Dislikes Her G.I. Joe Action Figure

  1. LauraN says:

    Why are we assuming she’s being honest? It seems to me she’s lied before… not to mention that someone who was having an affair with a married man may not be the most trustworthy/honest person around… And no, I won’t be seeing this – not just because she’s in it, but because it looks like it blows all around.

  2. Q says:

    Hell… i didn’t even know she was in it..

  3. oh my goodness says:

    oh well. that’s what you get when you sleep around too much- people don’t like you, then they make your action figure UGLY! do you guys know how many guys she’s hooked up with? i found a list of all of her hookups the other day, and let’s jsut say, you should just look at it for yourselves- http://www.ranker.com/list/sienna-miller_s-loves–and–hookups/celebrityhookups

  4. Anonymous says:

    This is Sienna Miller….what acting skills could she possibly be talking about?? Maybe for her next role she can act like a decent person and not sleep with married men.

  5. Monica says:

    ahahah I think that’s hilarious that she thinks her doll is ugly. It shouldn’t be though because she is gorgg!

  6. merce369 says:

    :-) this girl just does like the movie and director she had chosen to film in. Funny.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Her GI doll is 100% Sienna: cross-eyed and possessed; reflective of her “inner beauty” (selfish, amoral stalker of balthazar). She also seems fixated on her breasts and loves to talk about them. Her flashing the papparazi is her fantasy, a dare she did because in truth she is an exhibitionist, that is how she gets her thrills even at the expense of other people (er, wives or girlfriends)

  8. Anonymous says:

    If there wasn’t such a thing as bad press, SM wouldn’t constantly try to deflect from her bad behavior by playing the victim. Notice that during this promotion SM had to pretend that she wasn’t sleeping with the married man? Why? Because people are not impressed by her antics with the married man and producers/directors know that something like this can make or break their project.

    First we are supposed to feel sorry for her because she was almost injured on the set. Now we are supposed to feel sorry for her because the writing was bad and her action figure is ugly? Wasn’t this the same woman talking about how HW beauty is not real and sbout HW outs too much pressure on women to be pretty? Once again SM proves that she is superficial. She is taunting a mother and her 4 kids and then gets upset because her doll is ugly?

    The problem with SM is that she has an exagerrated sense of entitlement. She thinks that she can say and do whatever she wants without ever being held accountable for her actions. If she is going to be bold enough to bite the hand that feeds her (or flaunt her affair), then she should be bold enough to deal with the consequencs of that actions. In other words, she needs to grow up and accept responsibility for her actions.

  9. AliceW says:

    Aah, I see the love-the-married-man-but-bash-the-single-woman-who-dares-to-go-out-with-the-man-who-said-he-was-separated haters are out again… I like Sienna Miller, she’s beautiful, funny and a right little minx. Can she act? I think she can, I loved her performance as Edie Sedgwick.

  10. Anonymous says:

    ” Poor, helpless, angelic” Sienna. Why can’t people understand that SM happiness trumps the wellbeing of a mother and her 4 kids? SM isn’t responsible for her actions because everbody knows that being a single woman (and not the married one of course) means that you have the right to insert yourself into another woman’s marriage, flaunt the affair, make up lies about the man’s wife just because she won’t “play nice” and file for the divorce, and whine about your “pain” when people show more sympathy towards the married man’s wife and kids right? WRONG. SM gets bashed because she people are not amused by this war that she is waging against a mother and her 4 kids, especially when she keeps pushing the notion that she hasn’t done anything wrong.

    The married man has NEVER EVER said that he was separated, SM and her mothers made up this lie to justify her actions with the married man. Just because a married man “might be” separated does not mean that a single women has the right to sleep with him. The fact that he still hasn’t filed for a divorce just makes SM look bad.

    Speaking of blame, SM whined in the Vogue interview about JL infidelity. why is it okay for her to keep criticizing JL when she is STILL SLEEPING WITH A MARRIED MAN AND SHAMELESSLY FLAUNTING IT?

  11. AliceW says:

    Rosetta, is that you?

  12. Lizzypoo says:

    She just spurts bad press about anything to do with the movie. They need to lock her up until the movie is released ~ Liz ~

  13. Gisela says:

    Honestly refreshing? Honestly nauseating is more like it!

  14. lis says:

    She’s pretty much convincing me to not want to see a movie with her in it, ever again. While it’s her prerogative to tell the truth and be honest.. it’s really tacky. It’d be one thing to admit years later that the acting wasn’t that great, and the action figure was really weird. But why should I want to buy a deformed action figure? Or see a movie with bad acting? Not good incentive if part of your job is to get people to watch the movie you made, so that it makes money.

  15. kiki says:

    I don’t know what is with all these celebrities biting the hands that feed them. If you are an actress, do you really think it is a good idea to go around critizing directors? Who would want to work with you? Stupid girls. They don’t appreciate the life some girls would die for. Sienna, nor Megan, can act. So they should just shut up and be happy with what they get. Also, her legs are not attractive at all.

  16. Jenelle says:

    She’s stupid for being so negative.

  17. DonnaJ says:

    A married guy should grudge f@ck her.

    Oh wait, that’s already happened.

  18. emches says:

    I’m still not even the least bit interested in watching the movie, HA! —em’s

  19. CapturingLife says:

    I think I am always in the minority. I have a soft spot for the crazy, say-and-do-the-wrong-thing girls (Lindsay, Sienna, Megan, et al). I’m very excited for the movie. Big action+Big screen = woohoo!

  20. Wonder_Woman says:

    I wonder if their is any truth to directors being very sexist to female actors?

    But anyway,
    If she felt her acting wasnt challenged in the movie, why take the role? If she felt she was being used just as a sexual object in the movie (which was her purpose) why be insulted if you are treated as one? If then she took the role accepting being a sexual object, why b1tch? Then why expect for anyone to take your acting seriously (this goes to megan fox too) if you want easy roles where you just flaunt your a$$ and tits>?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>