Gilles Marini Won't Be Back For More Sex

Gilles Marini Won't Be Back For More Sex

As in 'Sex and the City,' I mean ;) If you remember, Gilles Marini had a brief (but memorable) role as Samantha's well-endowed neighbor Malibu neighbor. Unfortunately, his character reportedly was not included in upcoming 'Sex and the City' sequel.

"As far as I know, he will not be in the sequel," Marini's rep says.

Since shooting reportedly begins within the next couple of weeks, that's not a good sign.

However, if you can catch Gilles in a guest role on 'Brothers and Sisters' as well as 'Nip/Tuck.'

Is this news a bummer or are you okay with Gilles not being in the 'Sex and the City' movie?

Photos by Wenn.com

Gilles Marini Won't Be Back For More SexGilles Marini Won't Be Back For More SexGilles Marini Won't Be Back For More SexGilles Marini Won't Be Back For More SexGilles Marini Won't Be Back For More Sex



COMMENTS...

<a href="/user/9155" title="View user profile.">DonnaJ</a>
128110 points
DonnaJ said:

I wouldn't kick him out of bed.

Gisela Gisela said:

I would...after I'm done. Tee hee...LOL!

<a href="/user/9155" title="View user profile.">DonnaJ</a>
128110 points
DonnaJ said:

LOL! Don't you wanna recharge the battery and get a little more use out of him? ;O)

Gisela Gisela said:

Oh, but I never said how many DAYS after I was done........then he can limp his way out of my room.

<a href="/user/9155" title="View user profile.">DonnaJ</a>
128110 points
DonnaJ said:

I'm gonna be good...I'm gonna be good. :O)

<a href="/user/3596" title="View user profile.">Ha</a>
2805 points
Ha said:

Why WOULD he be back for the next movie? The only one that would make sense being brought back would be Louise, Jennifer Hudson's character.

Gisela Gisela said:

Because he has a big d*ck! a big d*ck! that is enough reason....LOL

<a href="/user/14013" title="View user profile.">emches</a>
22800 points
emches said:

Dirty girl! ---em's

<a href="/user/15746" title="View user profile.">Wonder_Woman</a>
19090 points
Wonder_Woman said:

YUP THAT SEEMS LIKE A PERFECTLY LOGICAL REASON

<a href="/user/9155" title="View user profile.">DonnaJ</a>
128110 points
DonnaJ said:

Peter Steele has a nice one. ;O)

<a href="/user/3596" title="View user profile.">Ha</a>
2805 points
Ha said:

I guess I'm looking at this for completely the wrong reason? I'm sure they can find someone else with a huge schlong for the next one.

<a href="/user/5294" title="View user profile.">merce369</a>
1197925 points
merce369 said:

yum

<a href="/user/541" title="View user profile.">Katie</a>
870 points
Katie said:

Who would not want to see more of him ;)

<a href="/user/100" title="View user profile.">misschristina</a>
2990 points
misschristina said:

Okay yes he's good looking, but he had a bit part in the movie. How many lines did he have? Very few, so why WOULD he be back? I wouldn't have assumed he would've.

elaine123
7255 points
elaine123 said:

Because he made such an impact with the audience in the first movie, or at least his naked body did. His scenes are the only ones that I remember from the movie. The producer/director must know this so it would have been very plausible to see him back, preferably naked again.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

He spoke during the movie, I didnt notice. LOL.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This is to prove that you are a human, and not a spam bot.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

When commenting, please be respectful to other INO readers. No racial, sexual or homophobic slurs will be tolerated.