As in ‘Sex and the City,’ I mean 
If you remember, Gilles Marini had a brief (but memorable) role as Samantha’s well-endowed neighbor Malibu neighbor. Unfortunately, his character reportedly was not included in upcoming ‘Sex and the City’ sequel.
"As far as I know, he will not be in the sequel," Marini’s rep says.
Since shooting reportedly begins within the next couple of weeks, that’s not a good sign.
However, if you can catch Gilles in a guest role on ‘Brothers and Sisters’ as well as ‘Nip/Tuck.’
Is this news a bummer or are you okay with Gilles not being in the ‘Sex and the City’ movie?
Photos by Wenn.com
Okay yes he’s good looking, but he had a bit part in the movie. How many lines did he have? Very few, so why WOULD he be back? I wouldn’t have assumed he would’ve.
Because he made such an impact with the audience in the first movie, or at least his naked body did. His scenes are the only ones that I remember from the movie. The producer/director must know this so it would have been very plausible to see him back, preferably naked again.
He spoke during the movie, I didnt notice. LOL.
I wouldn’t kick him out of bed.
I would…after I’m done. Tee hee…LOL!
LOL! Don’t you wanna recharge the battery and get a little more use out of him? ;O)
Oh, but I never said how many DAYS after I was done……..then he can limp his way out of my room.
I’m gonna be good…I’m gonna be good. :O)
Why WOULD he be back for the next movie? The only one that would make sense being brought back would be Louise, Jennifer Hudson’s character.
Because he has a big d*ck! a big d*ck! that is enough reason….LOL
Dirty girl! —em’s
YUP THAT SEEMS LIKE A PERFECTLY LOGICAL REASON
Peter Steele has a nice one. ;O)
I guess I’m looking at this for completely the wrong reason? I’m sure they can find someone else with a huge schlong for the next one.
yum
Who would not want to see more of him