Fact Or Fiction: Julia Roberts Hires 350 Body Guards While In India

Pin It


Julia Roberts has hired 350 security guards to protect her while she films in India. The Oscar-winning actress and her children, four-year-old twins Hazel and Phinnaeus and son Henry, two, are staying in the town of Pataudi, near the capital Delhi, while Julia shoots new film ‘Eat, Pray, Love’.

Julia and husband Danny Moder are so worried about their family’s safety they have employed hundreds of bodyguards, including police officers and snipers.

They are transported everywhere in bulletproof cars and helicopters patrol the skies 24 hours a day.

But Julia’s extreme security regime has enraged locals, who have been banned from attending a Hindu temple when the star is filming there.

A police officer said: “Nobody can breach the cover. We have strict instructions.”

The restrictions are particularly upsetting for locals as September is one of the holiest months in the Hindu calendar. One worshiper said: “It’s the holiest time of the year and we must not be stopped from visiting our own temple.”

What do you think about this story? Did Julia really hire that many people? Helicopters? Bullet proof cars? Fact or fiction?

Check out my other online properties!!

This entry was posted in Fact or Fiction and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Fact Or Fiction: Julia Roberts Hires 350 Body Guards While In India

  1. switchstance5 says:

    Eh – that seems a bit much.

  2. valcat says:

    Only 350? : )

  3. Anonymous says:

    I don’t understand something. Didn’t a really big terrorism attack (or tragedy as we say here) recently occur in India? If I am JR or her producer security is almost as important as the shoot. Just think of the publicity that would engender to some jihadist if JR were to be beheaded on a video cam while chanting something about Allah.
    If this didn’t really occur, that is all the security and shutting down of the temple….it should have.

  4. bgduckie_01 says:

    350 is a lot! i dont think its true but who knows.

  5. Monica says:

    That has got to be fictional.

  6. Anonymous says:

    350 seems a bit excessive.

  7. Nicole says:

    I’m sure she had a lot of security since India is not the safest place right now, but 350 is probably exagerating a bit.

  8. Phinnaeus says:

    She’s a typical Hollywood leftest who thrives on the public that goes to see her movies but wants the so called adoring public to be invisible when she walks down the street. Who really cares what she does. It’s okay that she makes millions per film but not Okay for the CEO of any company to make millions. I like Julia but get a life people, why do you give a rats ass. It’s all lies, just like Obama..

  9. Chelle says:

    Fiction. They need to create press for the movie.

  10. Anonymous says:

    There was something ‘official’ that I read about Johnny Depp bowing out of a film in India for security reasons. His team went to check out the location, after filming had already been postponed by the writers strike and then typhoon season. The security team said, ‘no way.’ I don’t know why, but it seems India is a dangerous place.

  11. CapturingLife says:

    Probably some local was disgruntled over something to do with the film or her and set off a wild rumor…

  12. C. says:

    ATTENTION kids: I just learned of a really easy way to rack up your points without much effort. Vera just told me not to flag the duplicates. Per Vera,

    people can post however many times they want on the same subject
    even if it’s the same words
    :)
    thanks
    V

    So, cut and past away! I didn’t want to keep this all to myself ;)

  13. C. says:

    That’s insane. How would you even know who was working for you and who wasn’t with that many people? I don’t buy it.

  14. Anonymous says:

    I can believe it maybe not that many but to some extent. These celebrities think so highly of themselves that they wouldn’t care about disrupting someone else’s life or religion.

  15. Anonymous says:

    If this is true, that’s so wrong. It is a holy month for Hindus, I think it’s the week of Navratri for them so for them not to be able to pray at their local temple because someone is shooting a film must be pissing them off…

  16. BoN says:

    You are correct.
    It’s basically denying them access into their place of worship.

  17. YAYI says:

    Lies!!!

  18. chichi says:

    Maybe I am missing something but I don’t find Indians so threatening that they would need so many bodyguards. I think its fiction!

  19. DonnaJ says:

    India and Pakistan border one another. There’s a lot of threat there.

  20. audrey says:

    I heard that India was unsafe to travel in right now because of terrorist threats. And how insensitive of the film company to not have done some research before going to a foreign country to film. Indians take their Holy days very seriously.

  21. Nicole says:

    That’s what I was going to say. They really should’ve done it a month ago, or next month, when it isn’t such a holy month for the Hindus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>