Brandi Glanville Slams LeAnn Rimes As A Stepmom

brandi glanville slams leann rimes' parenting

Looks like the whole “co-parenting” thing isn’t working so well between Brandi Glanville, Eddie Cibrian, and LeAnn Rimes. Brandi sat down with Us Weekly and shared her concerns about LeAnn taking care of her sons.

“I, unfortunately, don’t find her to be stable and I don’t want her around my kids when Eddie’s not there — or at least the nanny, his parents, someone. Mason, my eldest, ate some of Le’s candies and got extremely ill. And Le’s candies are laxatives. It was a big f–king deal for me, and I lost my mind.

“She has one in every purse. Mason found on on the floor and thought it was a Skittle! They don’t keep sugar in the house. He thought he finally found candy.”

OMG! For the record, LeAnn’s rep’s response to these claims was “Just more inaccuracies and half-truths.” If this is true, Brandi needs to head to court! Brandi is also upset about a video LeAnn posted of her sons riding bikes without helmets when Eddie refuses to allow them to be on ‘The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills.’

“I just thought it was very hypocritical of LeAnn to post this video… He doesn’t have a helmet on and he’s driving without his training wheels, which he doesn’t even do at my house. These are my children and I don’t want this unstable person around them when she’s alone.”

Eddie’s response was:

“It is absolutely ridiculous that my ex-wife continues to put the personal lives of myself, LeAnn, our sons and my family on public display for the sake of her notoriety. She is fully capable and has the means of contacting myself and LeAnn privately to discuss any matter concerning the children. The fact she chooses not to, should be pretty transparent. And while I do not wish to fuel her ever-igniting fire, there is a breaking point where enough is enough.
“My wife, LeAnn, continues to be a loving and positive influence on the lives of my sons. They are without a doubt lucky to have her. The love they have for their ‘bonus mom’ continues to grow each day as we navigate the changes to our family; a fact that Brandi cannot argue as she herself has stated as much. If my ex-wife truly cared about the welfare of our sons, she would stop the constant bashing on an important person in their lives and focus on productive co-parenting to make our blended family the strongest it can be. And she would do so privately. Let’s see…”

Brandi claims when she attempts to contact either Eddie or LeAnn, there’s no response. I feel badly for the boys caught in the middle of all this.

[gallink]

Photos by FAMEFLYNET

Comments

  1. sam says

    If Eddie truly wanted this out of the public’s eye, then why won’t he just tell Leann to stop posting photos, tweets, videos, and blogs about his children? Why hasn’t Eddie asked Leann to remove all the stuff she has posted about his kids if he really wanted this public? Why is it that this is a constant issue? Why isn’t the media calling Leann out for how she interfers. Eddie’s response isn’t actually Eddie’s response. You can tell by the choice of words used in that paragraph that Leann wrote it. We also know that Leann wrote “Eddie’s” statement because she has been tweeting and posting about “bonus parents” and blended families the entire week just last night she posted a link to a website about blended families. There is misconception, this never stopped. Leann has continually been taunting Brandi on a daily basis. Just check out all the passive aggressive tweets Leann sent out yesterday. She also made another passive aggressive tweet today. If “Eddie” was concerned about the bashing of Leann, why does he allow Leann to sit on twitter and take digs at Brandi? Why was Guiliana Rancic at their house lastnight if Eddie was so concerned about the bashing and keeping things private? Eddie and Leann are hypocrites and the media needs to call them on it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>