Katie Holmes Spends $40k On A Makeover

Katie Holmes Spends $40k On A Makeover

I know there's a price to pay for looking good, but at $43,239 Katie Holmes takes this concept to a new level! That's how much she spent on spa treatments before the Japan premiere of Valkyrie last week.

The mother-of-one is said to have
splashed out a fortune on the incredible makeover, which took more than two
days to execute.

While holed up at the
Ritz-Carlton in Tokyo
ahead of the red carpet appearance, Katie was reportedly treated to intensive
pampering sessions by a team of beauty experts.

She also apparently spent £7,000
in spa treatments, £20,000 in dental veneers and further £1,000 for premium
make-up.

And in some cases, looking good can really make you feel good too.

She was happier than she's been
in months.

 

That's a lot of money...was it worth it? Did Katie look 40k worth of good on the red carpet that night?

Photos by Wenn.com

Katie Holmes Spends $40k On A MakeoverKatie Holmes Spends $40k On A MakeoverKatie Holmes Spends $40k On A MakeoverKatie Holmes Spends $40k On A MakeoverKatie Holmes Spends $40k On A Makeover



COMMENTS...

<a href="/user/5761" title="View user profile.">ito</a>
5355 points
ito said:

please. she's a fashion disaster no matter what she spends.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I'm sure some consider what your wearing to be a disaster, but... we all have our own style. THANK GOD.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I agree with you. this outfit is wrong on so many levels. SHE looks gorgeous though. Too bad she has already ditched the extensions!!! What a waste!

Anonymous Anonymous said:

100% of the time - disaster!

Anonymous Anonymous said:

it's funny how we can go ahead and believe this story when it comes from the daily mail - uk. They have keywords such as, "apparently" and the grad-daddy of em all "source"... A source told so-and-so...c'mon ppl, this is fake and fabricated. While, I don't put it past any celebrity to spend that MUCH money, I don't believe this story, NOT...ONE...BIT...*CLICK*

<a href="/user/2081" title="View user profile.">Masons Mommy</a>
300 points
Masons Mommy said:

I think long hair is much more flattering on her.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Agreed

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Long hair, come back!

<a href="/user/190" title="View user profile.">lara jane</a>
45237 points
lara jane said:

For someone who spent so much on her veneers, she should've shown off her teeth at least once!

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Anxious to see those veneers. Her teeth are not particularly pretty. Maybe this will help.

meme
3170 points
meme said:

is that getup one of KatiE's "fashion designs?"

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I think that was her best look for month. minus the dress, not fond of that.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

...and the tights, and the shoes, and the colors...yikes!

<a href="/user/13518" title="View user profile.">Prevost1580</a>
300 points
Prevost1580 said:

I think that she looks amazing!

A friend of mine is a make-up artist to the celebrities and she said that Katie & Tom are truly in love and that the tabloid stuff is total B.S!

I still think Tom Cruise is a great actor. He just needs to not discuss, his religous point of view.

and btw! Suri is the cutest!! I think Shiloh is adorable but Suri doesn't even look real,she's so cute! Katie seems like a really good,mom too! Very grounded.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Glad someone finally called it right. Cute, that's it, cute - and that's all this kid is. Just like her Mother she's ordinary. No real beauty there at all.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Yeah, because you're the almighty person who is so awesome looking, you get to designate how beautiful each person is... what a twat.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

you are living in a dream world -- i have a friend who knows the men who tom pays to be with (the pay is to keep their mouths shut) and also to be the recipient of toms true interests

<a href="/user/397" title="View user profile.">momster</a>
12175 points
momster said:

Geez freaking Louise!!! 40K??????? And they put her in STIRRUP pants?!?!? LOL! She did look nice, but that's just ridiculous!!!! That's more than we support our family of SIX in a year!!!!!!

Anonymous Anonymous said:

she does look better than before, but i could only spend $200 and look better than that =D !

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Maybe you could buy yourself a little humility while you're at it.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Humility? Don't make me laugh. It's just a simple fact. It shouldn't take money at all to look better than she does. The girl is what some might consider cute but that's about it. Nothing special.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

To you, she's nothing special. What do you consider beautiful. There IS NO definiton of beauty. Your definition is not the ultimate answer. So why don't you smoke on that!

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Couldn't agree more! The issue here is taste. I think her taste is terrible. She's a beautiful woman--no doubt. But what she chooses to wear seriously detracts from her beauty. It is not how much you spend--it's how you spend it.

Callie
410 points
Callie said:

She does look 40 years younger so I'd say that's a plus. Dunno if it's 40K worth, but I know a ton of women who might spend that much to look that much younger. She looked terrible with short hair. The hair itself was pretty, but didn't flatter her at all. The longer hair is much better and makes her face look less angular and- well... old. Nice to see she's looking more our age.

Anonymous123 Anonymous123 said:

she looks stunning beautiful gorgeous...this is her best looks in years....she actually look like a woman for a change. If it cost $40 grand to achieve this look, than it's worth every penny.

<a href="/user/3162" title="View user profile.">gretel</a>
2670 points
gretel said:

I still think her upper body & her lower body belong to different human beings.

<a href="/user/76" title="View user profile.">sweet kiddo</a>
98250 points
sweet kiddo said:

lol ,you often crack me up !!!

<a href="/user/3162" title="View user profile.">gretel</a>
2670 points
gretel said:

But seriously, doesn't it look like that? I mean, she is very pretty, but there is a huge difference between her body from her waist up & down. That's some Frankenstein stuff going on.

<a href="/user/76" title="View user profile.">sweet kiddo</a>
98250 points
sweet kiddo said:

yeah her upper body is fantastic but if you get lower you can see that there's too much legs for nothing since there not that great ..but damn she really should have kept the extentions but loose the outfit all togheter ..

<a href="/user/87" title="View user profile.">Amy</a>
8770 points
Amy said:

She needed a makeover she was on the verge of having to change her name to Kurt or something. Looking a little too manly. She looks better, other than the ugly dress. I guess I will leave Tom alone today, although there is lots I could say.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

she has to look manly for tom -- thats the only way he can get it up

<a href="/user/84" title="View user profile.">tbtrfli</a>
3250 points
tbtrfli said:

OMGGGGGG - she looks GORGEOUS... and young again!!!! What a great transformation, Katie! Yeaaaaaaa!

Anonymous Anonymous said:

yeah she looks fine, but old daddy is getting a little wrinkled..

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Its a little process called...aging.. Maybe you've heard of it. If you haven't, you will soon - in the future - experience it. Then you'll know what wrinkles are and why they start showing. Plus, not everyone wants to be injected with Botox. M'kay.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Why in the world has she actually taken out the extensions????? What a fool.

Annon Annon said:

Her hair and makeup look fabulous here! The outfit on the other hand, it's hard to find words. She needs a new stylist! That dress, stirrup pants and shoes are horrible!!!

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Agreed. She was meant to have long hair, but the wardrobe is horrible. Overshadows how beautiful the rest of her looks.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

<a href="/user/1259" title="View user profile.">katgib13</a>
1530 points
katgib13 said:

Yes, it was worth it. With that short hair, she looked like she was 40.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

To bad she ditched this look for the plain jane look. As for Tom and Katie, I will never believe they're happy and in love.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Firstly must say the outfit is WONDERFUL. Its fresh, its young (she's not 50) and the hair extensions just add to how beautiful she really is when she is not wearing the dowdy mum look.

This photo is wrong on so many levels. I cannot say they look like a happily married couple. Why would you rest your arm on the shoulders of your husband as you would a friend or family member?? Her arm should be around his waist pulling him in tight or at least her body pointing towards his. Not a nice photo of a couple who are supposed to be together and in love. Maybe there should be a selection of photos of celeb couples who actually are in love with each other and you'd get my meaning.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The outfit is a mess and the hair looks very fake.

Anonymous Anonymous said:

holy crap, wtf is she wearing????

Anonymous Anonymous said:

43k just for one appearnce where she looks average? I think since Jennifer Aniston spends that muh only for her hair it is ok. But where are the people who complain she should give it to chairy or something oh may be I am in the wrong thread this kind of things are not applicable here.

cka3ka
300 points
cka3ka said:

I'm just glad she lost that hideous bob.

<a href="/user/2220" title="View user profile.">Nimbus</a> Nimbus said:

I think she looks great... don't know about 40k worth of great but hey, for them thats probably equivalant to our $400!! Don't like the stirrup tights though, they are best left in the 80's.....

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Katie looks so much better with long hair she looks young

<a href="/user/9771" title="View user profile.">Ladylala</a>
2685 points
Ladylala said:

40,000? What did she get???

Anonymous Anonymous said:

classy lady and quite gracious. I respect those that dont believe the trash magazines. They are above those stupidity.

arky arky said:

Hot couple and a natural one that is. Long hair or not she looks good and Tom is aging like fine wine. The best part is they are a happy normal family.

<a href="/user/745" title="View user profile.">gia</a>
510 points
gia said:

She looks tacky from the neck down & this only reconfirms my opinion that she should have never cut her hair so short...I have short hair, so I am all for people cutting theirs, but not her...She had really pretty hair when it was long, it was just silly for her to go so short. They have more money than humanly necessary, if she wants to keep these spas & stuff in business then she should go for it.
She spent that much on dental veneers & she isnt even smiling with teeth?!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This is to prove that you are a human, and not a spam bot.
3 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

When commenting, please be respectful to other INO readers. No racial, sexual or homophobic slurs will be tolerated.